It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
I can not believe the level of ignorance from some contributors ....
" they should stop strapping bombs to themselves, and stop sending over missiles"
You do understand they are not allowed to have a structured Armed Force like other countries or people. So they can not go to war to fight for their freedom in normal military fashion, their ONLY option is terrorism.
Just like U.S. citizens did against the British for years. Just like the IRA. Just like the resistance in WW2 etc....
The founding Zionist made it perfectly clear their intention was to displace and kill Arabs to gain Israel. They were not shy about it. I would love to know what you guys would do in that situation, just roll over and take it like the French did in WW2 ?
" Better to die on your feet, than live on your knees "
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
reply to post by Flatwoods
"Think about it, they had to put 1.5 million people somewhere. Bit too risky to put up gas chambers to exterminate them I suppose. Might be a bit obvious."
Originally posted by Flatwoods
Really? Would you fire a rocket at a housing development, not caring who got hit? Would you do that? Only if your goal was to kill the people that lived there.
Would you go into a cafe with a vest loaded with explosive and kill college students, like Hamas does? Would you board a bus full of schoolchildren and blow them up to, like the Al-Aqsa Maryrs brigade did? And if you did do that, how do you think the people on the other side would respond? Do you think they would just shrug their shoulders and say "that's alright, I understand."? I would think they would drop an atomic bomb on you if you did that. And they'd be justified.
A blockade is the mildest goddamn response I can imagine.
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
reply to post by Flatwoods
The reason why they did not take that land is WATER. The land is not that good.
They had to pull out of actually occupying the area because it was costing them too many men. A guerrilla war is very expensive in all kinds of ways. It had nothing to do with humanitarian reasons.
Think about it, they had to put 1.5 million people somewhere. Bit too risky to put up gas chambers to exterminate them I suppose. Might be a bit obvious.
Originally posted by Skellon
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
reply to post by Flatwoods
"Think about it, they had to put 1.5 million people somewhere. Bit too risky to put up gas chambers to exterminate them I suppose. Might be a bit obvious."
That is not my quote.
Originally posted by Flatwoods
I disagree. The Israeli settlers who built homes there thought it was good land.
The settlers who fought their own soldiers with fists and clubs to stay in their settlements thought it was good land.
They had to be forcibly removed by their own countrymen, because apparently they thought it was pretty good land.
Israel, in the interest of peace, gave it back to the Palestinians. Now the Palestinians chant "death to Israel" and shoot rockets and Israeli homes because they see good land over there too. Wonderful.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by Masterjaden
Give me a freakin Break, If I ever ran into this former marine, I would call him a big fat lying pussy to his face.
Jaden
Would you be willing to take a beating like that for your convictions? I believe he was willing to die to follow his and bring aid to the people of Gaza.
Since Ken O'keefe is obviously a peaceful person and would not stoop to physical violence over an insult why don't you find another Marine to say that to?
Originally posted by aching_knuckles
Originally posted by Flatwoods
Really? Would you fire a rocket at a housing development, not caring who got hit? Would you do that? Only if your goal was to kill the people that lived there.
Would you go into a cafe with a vest loaded with explosive and kill college students, like Hamas does? Would you board a bus full of schoolchildren and blow them up to, like the Al-Aqsa Maryrs brigade did? And if you did do that, how do you think the people on the other side would respond? Do you think they would just shrug their shoulders and say "that's alright, I understand."? I would think they would drop an atomic bomb on you if you did that. And they'd be justified.
A blockade is the mildest goddamn response I can imagine.
i dunno, it depends on if I had held my 5 year old son as he died in my arms after being shot by an IDF soldier or not.
A blockade is the mildest response? Good thing you havent heard about the Apaches with Hellfire missiles and predator drones and bulldozing far,s and homes and...well you get the picture.