It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randolrs1
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
All investment (read: non-consumption purchases) are speculative in nature, some just carry higher degrees of risk than others. The ones that are typically classified as speculative in MSM are assets with very high risk. However, even "purchasing" a checking account is speculative in nature; it is an asset, not money, and you're assuming that you'll be able to trade claims to that asset for something of value in the future.
Originally posted by randolrs1
reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I understand that you want to understand how the fundamentals of options differ from those of their corresponding stock. In truth, they're no different. An asset is an asset is an asset. In this case they're both imaginary. For example, a put option is essentially a contract between two people, which is also an investment. An investor buys the put option under the assumption that the contract (right to sell share at a certain price) will be of value at a certain point in time.
The option, like a stock, is real value exchanged for an imaginary asset that's future value is uncertain. Like a previous poster said, speculation is outright betting. As an addendum, I would add that all investing is speculation at varying degrees of risk. Some assets carry high risk of devaluation (fiat currencies, options) while others are less risky (gold and silver), but still carry some risk solely because all value is in the mind of men.
Originally posted by sligtlyskeptical
My point is that time is an equalizer. If a stock will be worth X based on their earnings, cash flows and future prospects, eventually the stock will find that price, regardless of what happens in between. The market manipulation is just noise and over long periods of time doesn't result in a much different return for a long term investor than they would have had without any manipulation.