It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by alaskan
I guess I should make it clear what my point was...
The guest of tonight's show was THE GUY behind the creation of these forums.
The topic of the show was THE FORUMS and their rise to popularity.
*How many of the questions asked by the listeners/callers of c2c had anything to do with the forums?*
I had a question regarding the forums, couldn't get through to voice it to the guy, and was extremely disappointed with the [typical]crap that actually did get through, so here I am on his forum letting him know...
Consider it constructive criticism.
Originally posted by Xilvius
5. This isn't a pro-marijuana forum, get over it.
Originally posted by alaskan
There was one old-sounding guy that called in at the end talking about his 20+ years of research and collecting samples of dinosaurs/fossils, and his take on what's happening to the planet, and the things he said were actually pretty interesting. (A LOT more interesting than hearing someone slur endlessly about a light they seen in the sky) And they let him make his initial statements...
But it was brushed off immediately as too much and they went straight back to summarizing the interview.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
I was so glad they finally brushed him off. They asked what evidence he had of any of this and he just kept rambling and rambling about what he knows is. He never offered any evidence. He never even really offered up what his theories were based on. He just spent 20 minutes explaining what they were as if they were proven facts.
Originally posted by alaskan
The very first thing the guy said was that he wanted to give them/the producers his number so they could contact him.
Exactly what evidence did any of the other callers offer?
Did they offer any other source of info aside from their company's website or embarrassingly pathetic breakdowns of theories/"personal experiences" that have been all over the internet/on the table by the thousands since discussion of the topic started?
You'd rather listen to people struggle to describe something they might've seen at night _which even they assume almost know one else has any idea about- than listen to someone who is TRYING to get people to get the information out without naming a single product?
"Denying Ignorance" since never.
[edit on 29-5-2010 by alaskan]
Originally posted by alaskan
Interestingly enough that was the topic of one of the very few good calls that made it in...
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
You talking to me?