John Stossel Defends Private Businesses Being Allowed To Be Racist, page 1

I find it very hard to disagree with that stance
I just can't understand how people can allow govt. to parent the people and the people actually being FOR this.

I think that this shows how divided the country is, sure
There is a threat that comes along with this

Some minority groups would maybe cause some violence, in fact surely
but then also that would cause another cause of loss of business
and that alone might help curb such business practices

Can someone tell me with confidence why that would be a bad thing?

I disagree with John Stossel here. Once you start letting private buisness descriminate against races, they may as well be entitled to do it against women. But denying the most qualified person a job, on merely grounds of gender or race does nothing for our economy, does nothing for racial-gender economic mobility, does nothing for the good of society.

So I'd much rather live in a society where one Service Stations owner feels their human rights have been completely violated; because they haven't been able to refuse black men service, than to have: E.g. 60 black people, made to be thirsty, tired, hungry, or just have to run a car without gas, all because of one owners ideology (and that 60 people a year fugure, is only assuming an average of one black person, wanting to visit the place, every 6 days.

John Stosssel made a huge mistake by advocating this kind of rubbish. Far better to lead this (particular) "level" of politics to the Ku Klux Klan (and we all know how many votes, people like them recievet!)

BUT...
One area I hold isssue with is here: In our facist U.K, it is illeagle to deny gay people to have sex in a Bed & Breakfast, if you also allow Hetrosexural couples to do the same. When an MP was secretly filmed, supporting this view, it became highly published by our "liberal" dictatorial press news.bbc.co.uk... and because of the way this media "non debated" what he said, it also resulted in loss of much Conservative Party support

Also when another MP spoke a simple fact; by saying gay sex is more likely to spread AIDS he came under pressure, to be sacked: www.ukwirednews.com...
It's this level of PC facism that the British public (as a majority) have clearly had enough. And is so it represents yet another area where a far more fundermental right (the right to be democratically represented) is being ignored. In a democracy MP's should still be free to speak unfasionable views, without their job coming under threat, from the crushing will of their own party (i.e. their particular branch of our Con-Lab-Liberal entity).

While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags

People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 3 days ago with 72 member flags

Federal appeals court: Illinois cannot enforce ban on recording police officers
  Posted 19 days ago with 45 member flags

Critical Mass Has Arrived: Fast & Furious Scandal - Dems Join With GOP
  Posted 17 days ago with 32 member flags

Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags

President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags

Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags

Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags