reply to post by JacKatMtn
Alright, I read through the article and I am finding something sinister behind this move.
Take into account the move in Oklahoma for the state to join or legitimize militias. Have the state join in with the militia, authorize them so to
speak.
Now on the other side of the country we have the idea being spouted that militias are allowed to have guns but not everyday citizens.
This is where I like to say how things happen. Movers and shakers do not go for the whole things. They take little nibbles on opposite ends of the
fence. One side says that militias have to be regulated and authorized by the government. The other side says that militias are allowed to carry guns
but not everyday citizens.
Well, to this whole argument. I am a militia of one, so their argument is irrelevant. As for being regulated or authorized. My authorization will be
deprived of when my cold dead fingers are removed from it.
California Police Chief Misunderstands Second Amendment Rights, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 20-5-2010 @ 09:05 AM by JacKatMtn
A new push to ban open carry in public areas, in the state have passed the appropriations committee and will be open for debate at a public forum on
the 26th of May.
What's more interesting is Ken James' interpretation of the 2nd Amendment..
What's more interesting is Ken James' interpretation of the 2nd Amendment..
caivn.org
Emeryville's Chief of Police, Ken James – outspoken proponent of a measure that would criminalize the open carrying of firearms in all public areas of the state – will be attending a public forum debate on May 26th entitled, “Exploring California's Open Carry Policy.”
James has argued that AB 1934, which the California Assembly Appropriations Committee recently passed, would eliminate the imminent risk to police officers that he feels open carrying promotes. However, the police chief isn't for criminalizing open carry for all private citizens, as he seems to favor protection for specific groups such as the Northern California Militia.
In an audio interview with KALW News, James said these illuminating words in response to a question about the rise in militia groups throughout the nation:
“In my opinion the Second Ammendment was written to provide the ability of normal citizens to band together and form an army just like these militias are doing. So I believe the militias are totally supported by the Second Ammendment.
reply posted on 10-10-2011 @ 01:55 PM by KilrathiLG
news.yahoo.com...,ca bastards passed it this is nonsense and ha;f the reason
i left ca to begin with just figured id add some new news to this one
Pages: ^^TOP^^
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.049 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.049 seconds
