It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rren
Originally posted by PieKeeper
Originally posted by Rren
Huh? Got a citation?
Scientific thinking existed long before the Bible was created, and existed in absence of the bible for centuries after it was. The Mayan's had no knowledge of the bible, but were some of the most knowledgeable astronomers, comparable to our level of knowledge today.
The bible did not create science, scientific thinking is something humans do naturally.
Didn't say it did... was asking about the 'it started when the first tool was picked up' comment. I even quoted it. (i've made an edit for clarification)
Originally posted by PieKeeper
That's not something you can really cite, it's more of an opinion. Although tool use and fabrication is scientifically oriented, it isn't formal like the scientific method and such we have today. Modern science dates back a few hundred years, but somewhat formal methods date back to the beginning of civilization.
It really depends on how you look at it.
I personally am not convinced of the "big bang theory" It is as bad as any religion, which is always about having a "starting point". As only an omnipotent being could comprehend infinity so it is our natural intellectual default position to have a "beginning" of anything
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
You will never convince Creationists that Evolution is real. They believe in their simplistic superstitions "because" they lack the intellectual capacity to understand something as big as Evolution.
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
You will never convince Creationists that Evolution is real. They believe in their simplistic superstitions "because" they lack the intellectual capacity to understand something as big as Evolution.
It is like trying to explain physics to a 3 year old.
The fact is their lack of intellectual development is actual proof of evolution, and that not all men are created equal.
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
reply to post by DeathShield
I do not think you understand exactly how dangerous these people are.
They would stop almost all scientific exploration if they had it their way. Simple because they do not see a point to it, or do not "believe" in the premise. Do you understand we are discussing a topic they would have banned in schools ?
The Tennessee Supreme Court's decision held in effect that the Butler Act was constitutional under the state Constitution's Religious Preference Clause, because the Act did not establish one religion as the "State religion."[30] As a result of the holding, the teaching of evolution remained illegal in Tennessee, and continued campaigning succeeded in removing evolution from school textbooks throughout the United States.
Epperson v. Arkansas: The Court held that the United States Constitution prohibits a state from requiring, in the words of the majority opinion, "that teaching and learning must be tailored to the principles or prohibitions of any religious sect or dogma." This Ruling was supported by The Little Rock Ministerial Association; a christian organization
The Organization claimed "to use the Bible to support an irrational and an archaic concept of static and undeveloping creation is not only to misunderstand the meaning of the Book of Genesis, but to do God and religion a disservice by making both enemies of scientific advancement and academic freedom."
Daniel v. Waters: a 1975 legal case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down Tennessee's law regarding the teaching of "equal time" of evolution and creationism in public school science classes because it violated the Establishment clause of the US Constitution. Following this ruling, creationism was stripped of overt biblical references and renamed creation science, and several states passed legislative acts requiring that this be given equal time with the teaching of evolution. This did not result in a prohibition of teaching evolution.
McLean v. Arkansas: In 1982 another case in Arkansas ruled that the Arkansas "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act" was unconstitutional because it violated the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution. Much of the transcript of the case was lost, including evidence from Francisco Ayala.
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
reply to post by DeathShield
Name me one science that the Christian church has not opposed at some stage.
Originally posted by Loken68
See how absurd Darwinism really is?
Originally posted by novastrike81
I'm pretty sure the most scientific breakthroughs of our lifetime can be accompanied to those who believed in God and/or followed a religion. To name a few are:
- Galileo Galilei
- Sir Isaac Newton
- Robert Boyle
- Blaise Pascal
...we believers in God and religion are clearly "lesser intelligent" people who don't deserve to be around individuals like you.