posted on May, 5 2010 @ 01:57 AM
A Wall Street analyst can easily go broke. As far as your connection to the CIA or other government agencies, I could believe that, though it is
purely speculation. Based solely on conjecture, I believe that one possible scenario is that the government (or TPTB) could have easily staged this.
There is just not enough information for me to believe one theory over another at this particular time. It does seem awfully convenient for TPTB
though and all of these failed "attacks" are very suspicious. I personally, am just waiting for more information so that I can decide for myself if
this fits in the same category as the underwear bomber. Just my 2 cents.
To the other poster that questioned why the CIA would build such a crude device, if it was in fact the CIA, well because they would have needed a
failed attack. In some cases, failed attacks work a lot better than successful attacks, if the goal is to get some legislation passed or money
allotted. For one, it still strikes the same amount of fear, without the negative political implications of having a terrorist attack on your watch.
It also makes the public think that your policies are working. Notice how the media keeps mentioning thwarted attacks and then they tend to
acknowledge the great work of the authorities in stopping these attacks.
Of course, I am not saying that this was the government, only that it is plausible, at this time.
--airspoon