NYC Bomber Suspect is a Fake!

Before I post my evidence to support my bold thread title allow me to preface my curiosities with some thoughts.

First, I found it extremely convenient that a terror threat happens in the midst of a huge environmental oil leakage in the gulf of mexico, one in which will end up dwarfing the Alaskan Exxon/Valdez spill from years passed. The sheer magnitude of this problem has been rumored to forever effect the gulf of Mexico and its marine life and business affairs. I do find it odd that a rudimentary bomb that never went off could eclipse this oil atrocity from the headlines.

Second, I find it odd that the suspect supposedly learned bomb making training in Pakistan, however he purchased the wrong kind of fertilizer that doesn't even explode.

Third, the suspect supposedly made it onto an airplane that was about to take off when he was supposedly on the "no-fly" list.

Fourth, why did they first say that it was a white man in his 40s when the suspect later proved to be a ME man his his late 20s to early 30s.

All in all this all seemed pretty fishy to me. Nonetheless, I am not one to get overly cynical and press everything as conspiracy. Most that know me on ATS know that I usually don't matriculate in the conspiracy related forums for education as much as other parts of ATS.

Finally something hit me when they released the photo of the suspect.



I am not that good with grabbing still shots off video, but rest assured, there is many angles and shots where this suspect reveals a FULL HEAD OF HAIR. However, when you watch the video (below) you can see the suspect really has a receding hairline and a huge bald spot on the back of his head. I am really at a loss and would like the great people of ATS to help me with this anomaly.




Is the guy in the video the real suspect? Is the guy they pulled of the plane a patsy? I am suspicious to say the least. Please help. Thanks,

AAC

Your supposition in relation to the oil spewage in the Gulf and the convenient smoking car bomb in NY is compelling.
If the terrorism target was switched to the oil thing , you would say wow they have won a battle.
Its a strange week.

reply to post by Dr Conspire


True. Did you see the video of the bald man and the picture of the suspect with the full head of hair? I'm hoping I presented it in a manner that reflects that as the main focus.

AAC

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation


I saw it and yes you're correct! But didn't they say they're supposed to be more suspects?

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel


I didn't think so. I just googled and he's the only suspect they're mentioning. Let me know if you find something...

AAC

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation


If I can I will. I heard on the news though they're looking for more people.

wow, u stole my idea
hahahaha

I had noticed the same stuff u did
and had posted it in another thread.

every false flag needs a scapegoat

nice find and good work

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel


I just found this...

New York – Now that law enforcement authorities have charged Faisal Shahzad, an American citizen born in Pakistan, in the attempted Times Square bomber plot, they will be racing to see if there are other people – in the US or in Pakistan – connected to the failed attack.

They do not know yet if there are more. Which means they are proposing that the "bald" man in the video is the "full head of hair" suspect pulled from the plane. Very interesting indeed.

I think something smells fishy.

Did Faisal Shahzad act alone?


AAC

Aljazeera were reporting that they'd arrested some of the guys family in Pakistan, that was on their ticker this morning.

Good spot though, the guy in the picture and the guy in the video are 2 different people.

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation


The fishy part is the internal militias, that is where our concentration needs to be.. Those militias are a worry for the US government, but I suspect they don't want people to know that fact..

reply to post by Acidtastic


At the least it proves we are being lied to. At the most, refer to the least.

AAC

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation

I agree your thread is different and I like your idea as well.
Great thread.

Very nice catch and I do notice what you are saying, is that photograph of the suspect recent?

Odd to find somebody on the same 'thought train'.

Hello fellow passengers!

Yes, the baldness - VIAGRA sales will be shooting through the roof with this guy's miracles!

The beard - a la natural morphed into close-trimmed.

Skin color actually changed AGAIN! (There was another picture somewhere and he was very dark skinned. In between the shirt removal webcam shot and the picture on the OP.)

And yes, the media distraction circus ... I mentioned that to a special person too. Glad you spotted it too! Means I'm not all that nutterz YET.

And the destination ... Dubai (though another newer report is making it out as a transfer point to Pakistan - how convenient after the Taliban video) but; what else is in Dubai (on the way)?

Don't peek at Haliburton and Dubai. I need at least one difference between our thoughts to know I still own my thoughts.

[edit on 5/5/2010 by Trexter Ziam]

Well, go ahead and call me a muppet sheeple, and accuse me of believing everything the MSM tells me to, but I'm going to have to disagree with your OP for a couple reasons.

First, the bald guy in the video may have been a "person of interest", but it was pointed out that he wasn't actually a suspect, and it wasn't clear whether he ever would become a "suspect". (sorry, can't find the link where I got that)

When I saw it, my first thought was, "That's just a guy taking off his shirt". The reason they gave, that made him a person of interest, was that he glanced over his shoulder. To me, that sounded like a pretty weak connection, but it was all they had, so they plastered it all over every news outlet from here to Bangkok.

Now, put yourself in the shoes of someone who expected a bomb to go off a short distance away. Would you stop and take your shirt off, or would you get the hell away from it as fast and as far as you could?

As much I, as well as anyone here on ATS, would like to be the one to de-construct a false flag OP, the fact that the guy in the video wasn't the guy they pulled off the plane doesn't prove squat.

Perhaps they fed that video to the public, so the actual perpetrator didn't feel anyone was getting closer to who he actually was.

The truth is, they simply traced him through the IP address he used when he contacted the owner of the SUV for sale on Craigslist.

He has already admitted to it, and claims he was acting alone. (Of course he claims that, he risks having his family killed if he says otherwise.)

The whole premise of your OP, is that the guy in the video was the would-be bomber, and the guy they pulled off the plane was a "patsy". It's actually the other way around.

reply to post by lernmore


As much as what you're saying may be true. After searching I have found no article stating the suspect in video was not the suspect. After more than a day you think they would've corrected that.

I thought they also connected the man taking of his shirt from footage where he is recorded driving through traffic. They surely didn't assume it was him merely because he took his shirt off. BTW, the bomb was never going to go off.

However, in the coming days we will see if this is substantial. Like if the suspect mysteriously hangs himself in confinement.

AAC

reply to post by lernmore

Now, put yourself in the shoes of someone who expected a bomb to go off a short distance away. Would you stop and take your shirt off, or would you get the hell away from it as fast and as far as you could?

Yes, if it wasn't connected to a remote detonator...as this rig was reportedly having.

If he had the remote detonator, probably a mobile phone trigger - why hurry and draw attention to yourself? If you're gonna make a call to set the thing off, you wouldn't be legging it down the street to get away from it.

From a rather dry perspective.
BP has enough money to buy the USA.
To deflect attention only requires a drop in the ocean of Global Profits.
They do not want to surrender too much profits(hey mansions for the offspring dinnee grow on trees), so a manufactured threat benefits MR Obama and BP.
The Pubic in general are so thick as S11 proved that Hey...anything short of a SHID ZU celll is believable.
"In th end coconuts cause fools to run".

Possible Suspect Eyed in Times Square Incident

In New York, police and FBI examined hundreds of hours of video from around the area. They had initially wanted to speak with a man in his 40s who was videotaped shedding his shirt near the Pathfinder, but backed away as the buyer became clear. The man had not been considered a suspect and officials said it's possible he was just a bystander. Police also received around 120 tips, and three of which were considered promising, and collected forensic evidence from the Pathfinder.

Come to think of it, it may have been a comment I saw live, made by Robert Gibbs, Obama's press secretary where they said he wasn't a suspect, but I found another news story linked above that says the same thing.

reply to post by AnAbsoluteCreation


You know, what REALLY worries me about all of these false flag/black ops, and 'terror' distractions, is the level of ineptitude displayed by the alphabet agencies/military involved.

I mean...come on..at least get a guy that at least resembles the agent caught on CCTV!

What hope is there is they cannot even organise a simple op like this!

There are a lot of agency chiefs or section managers that need to go back to training school i think.

Bloody useless (fortunately for us), but a terrible indictment of the US 'security' services.

In the UK, we lived with bombing and bomb scares on a routine basis for three or four decades (IRA), so too has the US had it's fair share of nutters planting and exploding bombs all over...bombings in the US are not a new phenomena, although they would like us to believe they are.

Why all the publicity over this one?

Why get all dramatic with all the major players getting their mugs on the TV?

This is a diversion folks. Economy, Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Revelations about Gitmo and the 'detainees' that were known to be innocent, massive oil 'leaks', ineligible president, social unrest, civil liberties being eroded by the week, climate-gate, take your pick really.

We have all of the above going on, and it's all hands to the pump from the 'leadership and MSM when there's a failed DIY bomb?



[edit on 5/5/2010 by spikey]