It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

April 28, 2010: Clear UFO caught during CNN broadcasting

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 1 2010 @ 12:19 PM
link   
Hi

while I am watching the following report I have watched something that under my opinion could be an UFO:

CNN Video

The object has a spherical shape and it appears at 23s.
Dp you have other hypothesis over the UFO one?

Here there is also the YouTube video but it doesn't report the presence of UFO:



Thanks






[edit on 1-5-2010 by Mario Maisto]




posted on May, 1 2010 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Mario Maisto
 

Plastic bag.
It's a windy day.



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 12:25 PM
link   
it's a unidentified flying piece of trash LOL

i think presenting this as a possible ufo is a little ridiculous ?



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 12:28 PM
link   
Nice find but upon closer inspection, I've personally come to the conclusion that this is more than likely just a plastic grocery bag caught in a breeze but keep your eye on the sky, they're out there



VJ



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 12:39 PM
link   
I am more interested in a car that can go through a brick wall with no visible damage to it. Not a broken tail light, scratch or dent. Interesting.



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 12:47 PM
link   
Looked like a plastic bag in the wind...

Not much else to say.



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:12 PM
link   
Looks like a "Forrest Gump" feather to me, lol.



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 

I agree Phage.It definitely looks like some kind of debris being blown about.



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
Plastic bag.
It's a windy day.


it's not a plastic bag
it's a CGI layer on the video.

The reason is because during slo-mo
replay, the object does NOT go behind
the CNN logo. It stops before it. There's
also pixelation issues around the object
when enlarged.

If it were real or a plastic bag, it
would have continued in the background
behind the CNN logo.

Therefore, hoax



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

CNN hoaxed a UFO in a piece about a car backing through a wall?
That makes sense.

It goes behind the logo.


[edit on 5/1/2010 by Phage]



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wolftotem
I am more interested in a car that can go through a brick wall with no visible damage to it. Not a broken tail light, scratch or dent. Interesting.

Very good point! How does that happen???



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Yep, looks like a UFO to me. Anyone who can identify that as a trashbag, has better eyes than me.

Appears to accelerate too.

But I see some of the usual players jumping on the discredit wagon, so I would suggest this was something that shouldn't be seen. Maybe an unintended acceleration due to the UFO?



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Wolftotem
 



I am more interested in a car that can go through a brick wall with no visible damage to it.


Right.

The driver "accidentally" hit the "accelerator" instead of the "brake".

Just like on 9/11, this is an obvious CGI....the "UFO" added in, because it is meant to attract attention at ATS.

Evil, evil plan?

Or, ...just clever marketing/advertising by Mercedes-Benz?

Or...is it.....?? Buwahahah!

No....maybe it was a distraction, because the guy who owns the car that had the rear window broken out by falling bricks was behind on his car payments and needed a way to get out from under the debt load.

Yeah, that's it.

OH...and he was the one who planted the "UFO".

Prove me wrong.




posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
It goes behind the logo.

ur right about it going behind
the logo. however, I doubt that a
plastic bag would keep it's shape
in that kind of wind.

here's the same video without
the CNN logo, distributed by the BBC.

news.bbc.co.uk...

there is also a thread already with this same
UFO

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


No, it's obvious that the BBC is "in" on it, too.

See, they say it's at

- five storeys up.


Obviously, they were given a script ahead of time, because anyone who looks at the video can clearly see that the car is on AT LEAST the seventh floor!!

(I wonder if BBC also reported this story before it occurred?) Because they were given the "script" too soon? And, THEY supplied the footage to CNN, later.....


To cover their tracks (and their obvious blunder) the BBC added the "UFO" as a distraction, knowing FULL WELL that ATS members would spot it, and therefore everyone would miss the glaring faux pas.

Oh, they are SO clever....they are masters of the conspiracy, you betcha!



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:38 PM
link   
here's the reason why I don't think it's a bag.
This video shows how bags in the wind
change shape and direction and are erratic.
That object in the video does not do
any of those things.




posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:39 PM
link   
Anyone not noticed the "lack" of damage to the car? Minor?
Surely reversing your car thriugh a brick wall there would be just a tiny bit more damage?



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:41 PM
link   
reply to post by jazz10
 


Sorry, cannot resist once more...


...a tiny bit more damage?


Because it's a holographic projection.

Or, could be one of those glitches in the Matrix. Happens all the time....



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:48 PM
link   

Thers no way at all this car crashed through the brick wall. Both cnn and bbc covering this ? This is strange . Someones playing a dangerous joke. The UFO I'm not sure of tho.

[edit on 1-5-2010 by bluemooone2]



posted on May, 1 2010 @ 01:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
here's the reason why I don't think it's a bag.
This video shows how bags in the wind
change shape and direction and are erratic.
That object in the video does not do
any of those things.


I respectfully disagree. If you slow down the clip and zoom in on the object in question, you can clearly see that it isn't consistently orbital in shape. Furthermore, there is a small shadow visible (presumably where the handle is located) that moves as the bag spins. The increase in speed can be explained by a downdraft which are very common in the locale of tall structures. I've viewed some very compelling videos but I believe that most agree, this is nothing more than a plastic bag.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join