At least not how i see it..but i have been known to be wrong lol
This is my theory..
try to prove it wrong or add to what i might have missed.
we all know at one time salt water covered the content's.
that's why we have the great lake's in Michigan...
Science say's it's from ice during the ice age....but ask yourself...do fish or there egg's live in ice? NOPE
there was apparently a massive change in how earth was gonna look.
there was probably city's like primitive culture's and so on.
it would have been in the area of africa as all mitochondrial dna says we are from africa.
it was just one giant land mass.
so we would have all been in a group as we do now..not here there and everywhere..it would be safer for us in a pack.
for some reason the land mass sunk we all lived on.
and the new land mass we live on rises from the water's.
then later split apart..to make all the continents we live on today.
and we start the history we know today.
Fossil remains of clams (found in the closed position, indicating they were buried alive) have been found atop Mt. Everest. Sedimentary layers and
fossil remains seem to be a testimony to a past marine cataclysm
don't confuse a flood with new land mass's rising from the depth's.
According to marine scientists in India, archaeological remains of this lost city have been discovered 36 metres (120 feet) underwater in the Gulf
of Cambay off the western coast of India. And carbon dating says that they are 9,500 years old.
But the point of my theory is to help other's look outside the box some.
So far the only explanation's for all of the event's is ..
B = Great flood
Why not the land mass's we live on today raised and others where are oldest living relatives lived sunk to be forgotten by history?
Ps i am not saying all land mass we know today sunk..some survived or we wouldn't be here today.
but it would have been a smaller area until the other's raised..
i am very unorthodox in my method of trying to describe this..so if you can please try to decipher what i am trying conveying and not be to harse i
would appreciate it
[edit on 30-4-2010 by TheAmused]