It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zeddissad
Kant, Nietzsche and Husserl should be there also. And what about Descartes? Bit strange that you missed all analytical tradition (Hobbes, Locke, ...).
Originally posted by EarthquakeNewMadrid2010
I don't really care for that tradition. Yeah I should have put Nietszche, Kant, and Husserl.
Originally posted by zeddissad
Originally posted by EarthquakeNewMadrid2010
I don't really care for that tradition. Yeah I should have put Nietszche, Kant, and Husserl.
If you don't care about tradition you don't care about history - it is IMHO legitimate view to see history as battle between tradition and novelty. At least cultural history clearly show such pattern. It is also base of Anglosaxon political system. Conservatives (should) represent tradition, liberals novelty. But our times are bit strange. "The time is out of joint ..." to cite Shakespear/Bacon.
Please take look at modern hermeneutics (H-G. Gadamer). You will probably realize that without tradition there is no understanding ...
Yeah that is true but the tradition that I like to focus my ideas around are from that of the school of idealism and continental philosophy and some scholastic.
Originally posted by zeddissad
Originally posted by EarthquakeNewMadrid2010
Yeah that is true but the tradition that I like to focus my ideas around are from that of the school of idealism and continental philosophy and some scholastic.
We should not forget modern (linguistics/psychoanalyzes inspired) French school - Lacan, Derrida, Foucault ... They all studied phenomenology which is rooted in German idealism ... Above mentioned Gadamer is also phenomenologist (he studied with/under Heidegger). Husserl and Heidegger studied Hegel and Kant precisely. Heidegger was also specialist at classical philosophy (presocratics, Plato, Aristotle,...).
Now I'm at my point - there are no best philosophers - all philosophers work on one thing. That is philosophy. Sorry, I'm bit drunk now, but hopefully understandable.