It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seventh
Originally posted by jthomas
That doesn't work:
Global Hawk: Length: 44 ft 5 in (13.54 m), Height: 15 ft 2 in (4.62 m)
Boeing 757-200: Length: 155 ft 3 in (47.32 m), Height 44 ft 6 in (13.56 m)
The object's subtended angle from the camera is consistent with the length of a Boeing 757, NOT a Global Hawk, so right off the bat a Global Hawk is eliminated from consideration.
Ah I see you are using scaling and respective sizes of aircraft with no apparent calculation method on which to cross reference the relative size differences, let me help you with that.........
"You cannot ignore that the specifications of the security camera are known, the size of the Pentagon is known, the sizes of Boeing 757-200s and Global Hawks are known, and the distance to the "object" from the camera are known. From taking the subtended angle of the "object", one can immediately determine the length of the object in the distance. That angle tells us that the length of the object is consistent with the length of a Boeing 757, not a Global Hawk.
"This is not a matter of drawing outlines. It is factual evidence that anyone can demonstrate to themselves. Give it a try; you can do it too."
Firstly.... Something to use as a basis to calculate measurements, which can then reliably be used as an accurate tool to cross reference, or project a certain size in comparison to an objects documented dimensions which of course can then be used as a solid foundation for size comparisons.
Originally posted by benoni
Mr.Thomas...
where on page one do you highlight your "120 ft diameter" impact hole??
Originally posted by ibiubu
reply to post by mikelee
I would ask jthomas and the rest of the "doubting Thomas's" to defend the ultimate conspiracy: that 19 hijackers caused all of this alone (or w/help from Al Qaeda). If you constantly nitpick and chastise any possible theories of what may have happened, you solve nothing...saving ignorant minds, please, save your own mind as it needs attention.
Please convince me of the official story that you so much believe...maybe start a thread on it. I would like to counter your theory and insult your intelligence.
Originally posted by mikelee
Why does the outline of a Global Hawk fit the dimensions in the footage IF it was really an airliner?
ANSWER - Simply because it wasn't an airliner.
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by benoni
Mr.Thomas...
where on page one do you highlight your "120 ft diameter" impact hole??
Right here:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4af757b05ec2.jpg[/atsimg]
Here's more:
911review.com...
Why does the outline of a Global Hawk fit the dimensions in the footage IF it was really an airliner?
Originally posted by Reevster
Ummmm ,I dont see 120 ft hole....a lot of black smoke covering a hole thats maybe 60 ft or less in dia. I know there is a better picture of the hole somewhere pre collaspe of the building surounding the inmpact zone...anyone have it ?
[edit on 16-4-2010 by Reevster]
The width of the severe damage to the west facade of the Pentagon
was approximately 120 ft (from column lines 8 to 20).The
projected width, perpendicular to the path of the aircraft, was
approximately 90 ft, which is substantially less than the 125 ft
wingspan of the aircraft (figure 6.1). An examination of the area
encompassed by extending the line of travel of the aircraft to the
face of the building shows that there are no discrete marks on the
building corresponding to the positions of the outer third of the
right wing. The size and position of the actual opening in the
facade of the building (from column line 8 to column line 18)
indicate that no portion of the outer two-thirds of the right wing
and no portion of the outer one-third of the left wing actually
entered the building.
fire.nist.gov... Page 35
Originally posted by mikelee
reply to post by jthomas
The NIST report is in dispute...why bother even citing it to prove a purported fact when its flawed?
What I believe happened...
bushstole04
The C-ring exit hole is significant because it is not consistent with building damage from a Boeing 757 impact. The C-Ring exit hole carries a unique signature, which can only be explained by something other than a 757 impact. No explanation is offered for this hole in the Pentagon Building Performance Report
Originally posted by mikelee
reply to post by Alfie1
In other words, because I have my own theory that goes against what some other think I'm wrong?
The same could be said about theorys posted in the entire website then. Totally irrational there Alfie1.