It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Argentina marked the anniversary of the 1982 Falklands war with a parade, and the country's president says Britain should turn over the islands.
Kirchner said Britain's claim of "sovereignty from a distance of 14,000 kilometers (about 8,700 miles) is not sustainable, neither historically, nor legally, nor geographically -- but, above all, it is not sustainable logically," The Times reported.
She added: "It's not an exercise of sovereignty but rather colonialism and probably the last such one. The question of the Malvinas is a stain that should be rubbed out."
After she spoke, war veterans held a march in Buenos Aires shouting, "Give us back our islands!" and "Out with the pirates!".
Hundreds of veterans and militant political groups gathered in the Buenos Aires banging drums and carrying sticks, finally converging on the British Embassy. Riot police were deployed to control them
Originally posted by TheCoffinman
i wonder how serios this could really get if the argentinians have that much support... i know the us wont back the UK in this dispute...
the organization constitutes a system of collective defence whereby its member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any external party.
The Parties of NATO agreed that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all. Consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence will assist the Party or Parties being attacked, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area
Originally posted by grantbeed
If the Falklands were attacked then surely every NATO country has an obligation to help?
list of members here -
www.nato.int...
Nato states -
the organization constitutes a system of collective defence whereby its member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any external party.
The Parties of NATO agreed that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all. Consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence will assist the Party or Parties being attacked, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area
As a Canadian, I hope that we'll be at the back of the line fighting over these rocks.
Does proprietorship of the Falklands have anything to do with Project High Jump?
Jason
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by grantbeed
You'd think, but that didn't pan out last time. We had to go to great lengths to stop those bloody Frogs from selling anti-ship missiles to the Argies!