It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wayne Madsen: Wikileaks is CIA Front Operation

page: 3
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 3 2010 @ 11:02 AM
link   
Well it may be or it may not be...I think at the end of the day we need to keep our guard up against all organisations.




posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 08:40 AM
link   
What gets me is that other sources dig up their infor after years of work sometimes. And Assange gets scoop after scoop which is printed by the Spiegel and the like and lots of cooperation from the inside. Its as if the information is just handed out to him.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 09:17 AM
link   
I don't CARE.

Who says the CIA is bad?
I know they have done some bad things, but that doesn't mean that everyone that works for them is bad or that they are bad.

Just say, for a second, that your mission was to 'save America' and that your organization KNOW - for a fact - that illegal and pervasive secrecy was destroying America. "

I say illegal because some things are not supposed to be classified in the first place. You aren't supposed to classify anything where classification is to conceal crime, corruption, efficiency of bureaucracy, or to prevent embarrassment.

I hope they ARE the CIA, because then the CIA would be doing the right thing.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 09:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kaytagg
You can say that about anyone..

Somebody could say your post is a CIA front, established to discredit wikileaks...

Doesn't mean either charge isn't true, but it's basically impossible to disprove. And at a certain point you just have to put a little trust into one organisation or another, until they do something to break that trust.


Its actually easy to tell if they are fronts.

1)They don't refute or even support the mass media OS.

2)Nothing on the elite/13 bloodlines.

3)Nothing on corporations.

4)Nothing on wallstreet(that we don't already know).

5)Nothing on club of rome,cfr,tlc or builderberg.

6)Supports/legitimizes the military war machine.

7)Nothing on chemtrails or its real purpose.

8)Nothing on HAARP and its real uses.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 09:24 AM
link   
I don't think that 'nothing on corporations' can be claimed.
IMO they've put out enough about Monsanto that everyone should be hating them.
But people don't read the cables anyway.



posted on Apr, 25 2011 @ 09:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by hadriana
Who says the CIA is bad?

Jackie Onasis Kennedy
Tunisia's Ben Ali
Egypt's Hosni Mubarek
Venezuela'a Hugo Chavez
Libya's Gadaffi
Panama's Noriega
Cuba's Castro
Ivory Coast's Gbagbo
Chile's Salvador Allende
Syria's Assad
Iran's Ahmadinejad

and several millions more who have been killed
or ousted or done wrong by CIA actions.

and that number keeps growing by the day
in the US. when people wake up to their atrocities.

edit on 4/25/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 3 2011 @ 07:09 AM
link   


and several millions more who have been killed
or ousted or done wrong by CIA actions.

and that number keeps growing by the day
in the US. when people wake up to their atrocities.

edit on 4/25/2011 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)


Yes, I understand that - I do.
But I'm not sure that the organization as a whole is bad. I am sure that men and women that join do not want to do evil so they join.
I'm sure that they get coopted at times to do very bad things.
But, I also know that (often ex)CIA agents were trying to speak out against things like the US relationship with Saudis Arabia, and the weapons of mass destruction fiasco.
Seems to me that mostly they do a lot to protect the US, but sometimes they get drafted to protect or serve individuals in a very horrid way.

If I were CIA, I'd be ticked.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join