It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Damian-007
I think 9/11 has been investigated, Scrutinised, Pull Apart, Analysed Profusely, Questioned, Blamed and whatever else you care to add.
In my opinion I have learnt all there is to know about 9/11 and I have formed my own opinions.
Originally posted by REMISNE
I am going to challenge people on here that want to believe the official story to show that proper investigations have or are being done.
Here is 1 example.
911research.wtc7.net...
It's not clear why the Pentagon BPS took eight months to publish their study (which contrasts with the World Trade Center BPS publishing promptly in May of 2002). The Report gives a vague account of the the attack plane's trajectory with unsupported quantitative details, such as the speed of the plane. It makes errors in illustrating damage, such as offsetting the C-Ring punch-out hole by about four feet.
The Pentagon BPS is the only government investigation of the crash of Flight 77 that admits to existing, but it was defined as and limited to an investigation of the performance of the building.
Originally posted by hooper
Fourth, it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, the only study or report on the crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. The FBI conducted an extensive study or investigation referred to as PENTTBOM:
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Fourth, it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, the only study or report on the crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. The FBI conducted an extensive study or investigation referred to as PENTTBOM:
Sorry but PENTTBOM was also more about the building not the crash investigation.
[edit on 27-3-2010 by REMISNE]
Originally posted by hooper
PENTTBOM was an investigation into the criminal act that led to the crash and an investigation of the crime scene. The ASCE report was about the crash and the building.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by REMISNE
I am going to challenge people on here that want to believe the official story to show that proper investigations have or are being done.
Here is 1 example.
911research.wtc7.net...
It's not clear why the Pentagon BPS took eight months to publish their study (which contrasts with the World Trade Center BPS publishing promptly in May of 2002). The Report gives a vague account of the the attack plane's trajectory with unsupported quantitative details, such as the speed of the plane. It makes errors in illustrating damage, such as offsetting the C-Ring punch-out hole by about four feet.
The Pentagon BPS is the only government investigation of the crash of Flight 77 that admits to existing, but it was defined as and limited to an investigation of the performance of the building.
Wow! Where to start.
First it is the Pentagon Building Performance Report, not Study:
fire.nist.gov...
Second, it was published in January of 2003, 17 months, not eight, after 9/11. Third, the report was produced by the ASCE, the American Society of Civil Engineers. Fourth, it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, the only study or report on the crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. The FBI conducted an extensive study or investigation referred to as PENTTBOM: www.fbi.gov...
That's enough for now.
Originally posted by hgfbob
WITHOUT leaving any impact marks on the facade of the Pentagon for wings, tail, engines, or marks on the lawn in the 35 min. BEFORE it fell.....
Originally posted by reeferman
well, another problem in that pic is i do not see is a large engine impact...
2 large titanium engine's that would not evaporate away... not touching the sides of the impact area ... hmmm.. nope..
great thread. I've always made that point that the so called investigations were half assed side show cover ups at best... and apparently so do people on the 911 commission ..
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hgfbob
WITHOUT leaving any impact marks on the facade of the Pentagon for wings, tail, engines, or marks on the lawn in the 35 min. BEFORE it fell.....
I have been doing lots of research for several years. I think i might have found a photo that might show where a wing impact barely on the Pentagon.
Problem is the angle of the wing would mean the other wing would have been dragging the ground before impact and there is not evidence of a wing dragging the ground.
i114.photobucket.com...
[edit on 28-3-2010 by REMISNE]
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
PENTTBOM was an investigation into the criminal act that led to the crash and an investigation of the crime scene. The ASCE report was about the crash and the building.
So where is the official reports of the investigaton of the hijacking and the investigation of the aircraft?
I don't know what you mean, "investigation of the aircraft", and the reports are in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. And you're are not probably ever going to see them.
Originally posted by hooper
I don't know what you mean, "investigation of the aircraft", and the reports are in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. And you're are not probably ever going to see them.
Originally posted by hgfbob
along with the engines hanging lower than the wings....no marks on the lawn...never could find an explanation as to why the tail left NO marks on the facade what so ever...there are intact windows...right above the hole...right where the tail would have hit
....and no one seems to have a problem with this?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hgfbob
along with the engines hanging lower than the wings....no marks on the lawn...never could find an explanation as to why the tail left NO marks on the facade what so ever...there are intact windows...right above the hole...right where the tail would have hit
....and no one seems to have a problem with this?
Well there was one report from a military witness near the Pentagon that the back of the plane (behind the wings) did not make it into the building.
There was an explosion from inside the building that destroyed the back of the plane.
Originally posted by hooper
Could you please quote that witness.
And also, this is thread about Flight 93. Not the Pentagon.