i think they should just allow people to go and service it... sending robots just gives one more thing to break. and what happens if the robots
actually do break? i doubt there would be another robot repair mission, and that would definitely be the end of hubble (and no doubt hundreds of
millions of dollars wasted on the robots).
Robots To Give Hubble Another Chance., page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 2-6-2004 @ 08:32 AM by John bull 1
The proposals would allow Hubble to have a controled landing so that it could be reused in the future.
news.bbc.co.uk...
Nasa's chief, Sean O'Keefe, has taken a step toward a robotic repair mission to save the Hubble Space Telescope.
In January, he said there would be no more space shuttle visits to service Hubble because it was too dangerous.
He has now said the US space agency would ask for proposals regarding the feasibility of a robotic servicing mission. It could take place in 2007.
news.bbc.co.uk...
Pages: ^^TOP^^
Mysterious Signal From Outer Space - Is Someone Trying To Contact Us?
Posted 13 days ago with 29 member flags
Posted 13 days ago with 29 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.029 seconds
Page processed in: 0.080 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.029 seconds
Page processed in: 0.080 seconds
