If it was a less destructive object, leaving us with a fighting chance like you say, they'd retreat to their bunkers and emerge later to pick up the
pieces. Having said that though, for any survivors, money, social standing, political office (the things that 'they' have) would have lost all
meaning and value, so I'm not sure how they would return to a position of power...by force perhaps?
Yes, I'm sure it would be under some sort of martial law with the military guarding and organising distribution of the remaining food and water
supplies. Those of use who were left would basically be made to work on reconstruction and if we refused we wouldn't be fed.
The British Government had all sorts of plans like this for ruling the country after a major nuclear war with power devolved to local ruling
committees (for those of you who haven't seen it, Threads is an excellent BBCTV docudrama made in 1984 which outlines all of this). I'll bet
similar plans are in place for ruling after a natural cataclysm like an asteroid strike.
Originally posted by razorbackhater
NO, they would not tell you. can you imagine how insane people would get if they knew they only had a month or so to live?
I hear what you are saying, but I'm not sure that there would be mass insanity. Every year, hundreds of thousands of people are told that they are
terminally ill with just a few months to live and they manage to deal with it without going insane. Many of them continue to lead everyday lives and
even work until the illness prevents them.
By not telling us, governments would be vastly underestimating human spirit.
We're really pretty strong and stoical and able to face adversity.
[Edited on 2-6-2004 by harrisjohns]