This video is extremely painful to watch. For me, anyway. Selective editing of answers given to questions, use of meaningless labels and categories, and coaching the viewer to have a conclusion before hearing the people at the convention.

:|
David Grouchy


[edit on 9-3-2010 by davidgrouchy]

That was one sorry excuse for a hit piece that I have ever seen.Since that did not work out as they had hoped they will now try smear anyone credible in the movement.That corespondent was freaking out on Colleen Rowley.I guess he does not like to interview whistle blowers who make the almighty US government look stupid.

Well I am impressed, if this does not wake up Americans, then nothing will.
I had expected ABC to run a smear campaign, wonder what changed their minds?

ABC did a good job; I still say the reporter was smug though.
I have seen that look before, it’s not just smugness, but there is a ridicule in his face expressions.
Personally, I don’t care for the reporters attitude.

I remember back in the day when..... Phillip Jayhan of letsroll911 (captain Missile pod) and Dylan avery were working very hard together putting together the 911 disinformation campaign which included missile pods and other far fetched theories for the Popular Mechanics Hit piece on 911. Yes, you heard that right.

I remember when they were making loose change, 911 'truthers' before they were called that, were banned from their forums as they debunked loose change, the supid theories and their agenda. It is amazing and not surprising that their video is number 1. Number 1 at misleading so many people and creating so many loose ends.

The Pod people financed loose change.

Operation Lead the Opposition a success.

KJ's post made me go back and look at it again. Here is the relevant quote (as nearly as I could transcribe it quickly):

2:54 "... claiming that jet fuel was not hot enough to melt the steel structures..."

I pretty much tuned that part out (repetitive M$M propaganda factor perhaps )

This was the part that "stuck in my craw:"

2:05 "... its gospel-the film "Loose Change..."

Is that film really a "gospel"??? Hell, I haven't even seen the version that was "titled" in that ABC clip. Of course, I have never labeled myself "truther" but many others sure seem to think so. I don't even own any black "inside job" T-shirt(s) or bumper stickers.


[edit on 9-3-2010 by rhunter]

Originally posted by rhunter
KJ's post made me go back and look at it again. Here is the relevant quote (as nearly as I could transcribe it quickly):

2:54 "... claiming that jet fuel was not hot enough to melt the steel structures..."

I pretty much tuned that part out (repetitive M$M propaganda factor perhaps )

This was the part that "stuck in my craw:"

2:05 "... its gospel-the film "Loose Change..."

Is that film really a "gospel"??? Hell, I haven't even seen the version that was "titled" in that ABC clip. Of course, I have never labeled myself "truther" but many others sure seem to think so. I don't even own any black "inside job" T-shirt(s) or bumper stickers.


[edit on 9-3-2010 by rhunter]

Thanks for getting the exact quote. The part that bothers me is the beginning with calling it one of many discredited claims. That confuses me quite a bit. I agree with you as I never called myself a truther either and while I did watch the movie, it was way after I had already realized something was not right. As far as loose change goes, I do not really remember what they pointed out as opposed to others so I guess I need to spend more time with my gospel.

Originally posted by impressme
Well I am impressed, if this does not wake up Americans, then nothing will.
I had expected ABC to run a smear campaign, wonder what changed their minds?

I think they really TRIED to run a hit-piece, but weren't able to smear it well enough. Either that.. Or the producer was a closet-truther. He did a good enough job to keep his job but still showed the Truth movement in a favorable light.

OK, I got the whole thing.

"Their film peddles some largely discredited arguments; claiming that jet fuel was not hot enough to melt the steel structures."

OK, so the jet fuel was hot enough and the steel was melted? I am certain that we were told that there was no melted steel and it was a fact that jet fuel does indeed not burn hot enough to melt steel. How is this claim discredited? I am mostly concerned with the fact that ABC seems to be contradicting the OS while claiming to discredit a "truther" movie.

I wonder if the Utube version will get a bigger audience than the ABC Nightline version.

When you watch both videos, Nightline comes off as having absolutely no credibility. This is why the world is turning them off, and ignoring the network news channels.

People who deny the facts presented in "Loose Change" are nothing but complete and total idiots.

Essentially, the people who slam "Loose Change" as being nothing but a bunch of lies are calling all the firemen who showed up on the scene and went into the burning buildings a bunch liars for reporting the large number of bombs that went off when the towers came down.

this stuff is something else to behold.....we are living in interesting times.....propoganda front and center

i think a good part of our gov't understands what happened and they are scared to link mossad and 9/11 because it is career suicide.....but i think they are very disgusted in how things were carried out...yet taken aback regarding how powerful and all encompassing this power was able to carry things out

the poster that said the us media sold out to big finance...big pharma...and big brother was right on