Useless piece of Fascist Crap written by the extreme Right's favorite little skank...Ann Coulter!
"Take Back ATS" by NOT posting such a widely discredited "Writer" as insightful.


[Edited on 1-3-2003 by Bout Time]

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Ann should be president. Read this. I mean really read it, force yourself to read it, if you can, democrats.

It's done. I have read everything.Word by word. And it wasn't difficult because...hey, wait a minute ! I'm not a democrat, that's why I loved this article.

LOL!
Bout Time, by saying she is a fascist and by saying she is deiscredited, well, that simply doesn't make it reality.

Rather than attacking Miss Coulter, a very intelligent woman who is well educated and very insightful, please explain where shi is wrong. I'm sure you read the editorial, and I'm sure you can debate and discuss the points she made in a more intelligent manner. Or has that hatred finally incinerated you from within?

Mr Crowne while I can appreciate why you consider Ann's article to be so well written and insightful, I fail to understand why you believe she should stand for President. Does she have other qualities apart from scathing honesty that qualify her for the post? And from a more cynical viewpoint would not her honesty and intelligence disqualify her from reaching the heights of public power?

I have no issue with anything she states in the first half of her article, but the second half would be better off in a cheap tabloid! Who other than Hilary, Anna and Susan are these fireman loving feminists of whom she writes? Generalision in this fashion is a tactic to be avoided in serious journalism. Is she seeking to discredite feminism en masse?

Perhaps you breed a different type of both fireman and feminist in the states. Here in the uk fireman have always been heroes and respected and admired by most women. If our passion for them goes beyond their duty then it's usually put down to the uniforms

(later on)

I did take some time to check out Ann's own site and read some of her other articles, so now begin to understand her issues with the less respectable crew of feminists, especially after reading about the work of Phyllis Schlafly


[Edited on 1-3-2003 by arc]

I ws being tongue in cheek, really, about Ann running for president. Although I do believe she'd have great traits that would make a good one. Her honesty and good moral character being a couple of important ones. Not that she wouldn't be called an immoral liar by those who don't like her conservative positions. I see baseless allegations being made about another conservative, Christian leader, why wouldn't she be attacked the same way?

Is it uniforms that women are attracted to? Darn, Arc, I thought it was my lovable charm, good looks and chiseled body that woem liked when I was in the army!

That was then. Now, I'm waiting for annoying chauvinism, male pattern balding and beer belly becomes the sex appeal!!

Thomas Crowne, you're a real and sexy chippendale. I bet that Arc can't wait anymore for a date.

[Edited on 2-3-2003 by ultra_phoenix]

lol

I have a pierced nose, wear combat pants and roll my own cigarettes - not exactly a good representation of 'women who love a man in uniform'

wear what you like boys - it's what's inside that counts

(and I meant that as inside your head, NOT the uniform, honestly, um.....)

not that I doubt Mr Crowne is delightful of course, its just neither do I doubt Mrs Crowne's aim with her weapon of choice

[Edited on 2-3-2003 by arc]

arc, do you mean that you are looking like tank girl ?

hehehehehe

no, not quite as butch

more like Linda Hamilton in T2 mode with no weaponry and a few more curves

Never you worry, Arc, Mrs. Crowne would only target me. She knows I'm a slick-talker. After all, how else did I get a pretty lady 15 years my younger?

Another great column by our girl Ann, eh TC?
How many times has Hillary flopped on this issue? And I hope if she comes out and gives her support it won't 'cost' the administration or the GOP anything.

Coulter has zero cred---a---bility in any circle except the Right; but, if you got out to more diverse sources, you'd know that!
It was a blast to see that Ken Star-elf-lawyer-lite-turned-gossip-columnist thoroughly trounced in debate of her "facts" on that new HBO Bill Maher show.
Funny how when she's taken out from behind the shield of a wordprocessor she doesn't offer much in the way of intelligence or factual debate.

C'mon BT, I know you're being facetious, this is Ann Coulter we're talking about.

And Starr is credible to you NOW?

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
After all, how else did I get a pretty lady 15 years my younger?

you bought her from the Southen Baptist Virgin Sale?

Originally posted by arc

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
After all, how else did I get a pretty lady 15 years my younger?

you bought her from the Southen Baptist Virgin Sale?

Mail Order? Stuffed tube sock in you Levi 501's? Respect, humor & courtship?(till the first anniversary, then it went to pot!)

As a matter of fact, Mr. smart-aleck B-T, I don't wear Levis as they are on my boycott list.

As far as the other stuff, when you conduct yourself as a gentleman and treat a lady as a lady, you can pretty much have the pick of the litter!

As far as Ann's credibilty, she has it in spades. It's just that is what liberal do; when they can't refute the message they attack the messenger.
Not only are her facts on target, she uses biting sarcasm. That has to sting any unsuspecting liberal who happens across a Coulter editorial!