posted on Feb, 12 2010 @ 05:37 AM
now that i've had a chance to listen to it again, i have the following observations to make:
1) wasn't sarah palin saying that she felt that if obama took a more supportive role in supporting our allies, which includes israel, that it would
help his chances of being re-elected? apparently there's something going on at the tippety top right now that us common folk aren't privy to.
mayhaps we backed down from a threat, one that put us into a precariously dangerous position with israel and i'm not sure how that plays out in the
isaac vs. ishmael drama.
2) if as conspiracy theorists claim, we are being run by a jewish cabal of bankers, not supporting israel seems a bit unlikely, doncha think? a piece
of the puzzle is missing. but what is it? if that piece of the puzzle is that obama is actually on the side of israel, why then would sarah comment
that he needs to show support for israel by his stance against israel's enemies. which she is suggesting, he is not doing. it's confusing.
3) if they are both on the same side, and are just pretending to be on opposing teams, why does sarah think he needs to be tougher on israel's
enemies, while obama does not? is that also just for show? and if so, and they are both interested in attacking iran, why hasn't obama already
done it? something's just not right. i don't think the conspiracy is as simple as it has been in the past.