It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Surprising Number Of Passengers On 9-11 Flights Had Military Connections

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 05:16 PM
link   

Many are the inconsistencies concerning Flight AA77 which allegedly struck the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. on September 11, 2001. We will not enumerate them here; other articles on this site already provide a detailed list of them. But new elements have recently emerged, resulting from investigations carried out by independent journalists.

We reproduce below an extract from Strategie per una guerra mondiale, a book by Pino Cabras. It brings to light the inordinate proportion of passengers on board Flight 77 who had ties with the military sector and who were officially reported dead on September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon.

On board Flight 77 there was a high density of passengers who worked at classified positions in the Defense sector: between 16 and 21 persons out of a total of 58 passengers.

The were aerospace engineers. One of them, Mr. Yamnicky, was a longtime CIA operative that worked for the Veridian Corp. as an aeropace engineer.

Another passenger on the list, Mr. Caswell, led a team of about one hundred scientists for the US Navy

Others worked for Boeing and Raytheon in El Segundo, California, on a project dubbed "Black Hawk".


(Links)
aangirfan.blogspot.com...
www.voltairenet.org...

Operation Northwoods


In 1962, the Pentagon's Operation Northwoods envisaged the US military deliberately crashing a plane and then pretending that this was done by the Cubans.

With Operation Northwoods, the Pentagon plan was to send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby.

The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names.


I wonder where the passengers are today.?...




posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by rainfall


I wonder where the passengers are today.?...


Dead. Let them rest in peace.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 06:17 PM
link   
reply to post by rainfall
 


I actually wondered weather it was possible if the “passengers” on the planes might need to “die”. Assume the government knew something was going to happen that they couldn’t prevent. Let’s also say that they needed an excuse to make a huge amount of money that needed to be spent to prepare to “save” our system go undetected. And particular people that may be needed in that event but would be noticed missing unless of course they died. Could you kill a few birds with one stone? Maybe!



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 06:24 PM
link   
The passenger lists are very interesting indeed. It seems the deeper you dig into 9/11, you uncover more and more evidence. Anyway to answer your question, it seems that most the passengers were murdered to prevent them from talking about the propulsion systems they designed considering that so many of the passengers worked for the Navy with a tilt toward propulsion and guidance systems. Other passengers may have had 'enemy of the state' tags or could have just been at the wrong place at the wrong time.

This video outlines the passenger list toward the end: www.youtube.com...

So yes, they are probably dead and let them rest in peace.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 06:28 PM
link   
Imagine that, a plane leaves the airport closest to the Pentagon and it has a bunch of passengers with connections to the Defense Department. Oh, that is proof positive of an inside job.






The only crazier thing for you to have posted is...

"A surprising number of people on board Air Force One....were in the Air Force"

[edit on 8-2-2010 by Swampfox46_1999]



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 06:42 PM
link   
I always thought it was a feasable hypothosis , that the planes could have had CIA agents on board. and they landed at some base and the people got off and went where they were told to go to recieve a new life and payment. Then they remote controlled the planes or something into the towers. No planes hit the pentagon and none crashed in Shanksville.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 06:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
 


Easy Swampy, not everyone's been here every single day for the past 6 years...

Here's some older threads on this topic.
What I found most interesting besides the DoD connections (which yes, are completely
plausible), were the connections to the Global Hawk pilotless aircraft program.

(5/25/05) Raytheon involved in 9/11 ???

(5/24/07) Is it a coincidence that 14 people on the planes worked for.....

(6/7/09) Complete Remote Airliner Control Before 9-11


As details of the passengers on the four hijacked flights emerge, some are shown to have curious connections to the defense company Raytheon, and possibly its Global Hawk pilotless aircraft program (see 1998 (D) and August 2001).

1) Stanley Hall (Flight 77) was director of program management for Raytheon Electronics Warfare. One Raytheon colleague calls him "our dean of electronic warfare." [AP, 9/25/01]

2) Peter Gay (Flight 11) was Raytheon's Vice President of Operations for Electronic Systems and had been on special assignment to a company office in El Segundo, Calif. [AP, 9/25/01] Raytheon's El Segundo's Electronic Systems division is one of two divisions making the remote controlled Global Hawk. [ISR Journal, 3/02]

3) Kenneth Waldie (Flight 11) was a senior quality control engineer for Raytheon's electronic systems.

4) David Kovalcin (Flight 11) was a senior mechanical engineer for Raytheon's electronic systems. [CNN, 9/01]

5) Herbert Homer (Flight 175) was a corporate executive working with the Department of Defense. [CNN, 9/01, Northeastern University Voice, 12/11/01]

Raytheon employees with possible links to Global Hawk can be connected to three of the four flights. There may be more, since many of the passengers' jobs and personal information have remained anonymous.
A surprising number of passengers, especially on Flight 77, have military connections. For instance, William E. Caswell was a Navy scientist whose work was so classified that his family knew very little about what he did each day. Says his mother, "You just learn not to ask questions." [Chicago Tribune, 9/16/01]


(10/01/01) Civil-Military Interoperability For GPS Assisted Aircraft Landings Demonstrated

A government-industry team accomplished the first precision approach by a civil aircraft using a military Global Positioning System (GPS) landing system Aug. 25 at Holloman AFB, N.M., Raytheon Company announced today.

A FedEx Express 727-200 Aircraft equipped with a Rockwell-Collins GNLU-930 Multi-Mode Receiver landed using a Raytheon-developed military ground station. Raytheon designed and developed the differential GPS ground station under an Air Force contract for the Joint Precision Approach and Landings System (JPALS) program.


And another Raytheon connection-

(10/05/01) Phantom Flight From Florida
web.archive.org...://www.tampatrib.com/MGA3F78EFSC.html

TAMPA - The twin-engine Lear jet streaked into the afternoon sky, leaving Tampa behind but revealing a glimpse of international intrigue in the aftermath of terrorist attacks on America.

The federal government says the flight never took place.

But the two armed bodyguards hired to chaperon their clients out of the state recall the 100-minute trip Sept. 13 quite vividly.

In the end, the son of a Saudi Arabian prince who is the nation's defense minister and the son of a Saudi army commander made it to Kentucky for a waiting 747 and a trip to their homeland.

The hastily arranged flight out of Raytheon Airport Services, a private hangar on the outskirts of Tampa International Airport, was anything but ordinary. It lifted off the tarmac at a time when every private plane in the nation was grounded due to safety concerns after the Sept. 11 attacks.



posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 08:58 PM
link   
reply to post by aecreate
 





Easy Swampy, not everyone's been here every single day for the past 6 years...


And neither have I. What is your point?



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 11:49 AM
link   
Many people involved with the 911 flights actually believed they were conducting exercises. As the early part to mid september saw many war game exercises and experiments.

The war games were used as cover to achieve and execute the real attacks.



posted on Feb, 9 2010 @ 12:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by rainfall
We reproduce below an extract from Strategie per una guerra mondiale, a book by Pino Cabras. It brings to light the inordinate proportion of passengers on board Flight 77 who had ties with the military sector and who were officially reported dead on September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon.


DING DING DING! "Guilt by association" alert!

This is nothing but more of the five degrees of separation, "Kevin Bacon" games the conspiracy people play to manufacture innuendo and create an artificial veneer of impropriety, based entitely upon guilt by association. Even then, there still isn't any guilt, becuase it's entirely innuendo that the military sector is even guilty of anything sinister to begin with.

You lose your argument by default.



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join