reply to post by St Udio
While I am not convinced of any grand conspiracy per se that is causing/creating this, I have no doubt that it is happening. I also think that there
are those who are driving the the country to this place, perhaps as a matter of collective ideology rather than an outright conspiracy.
One of the problems we currently have is that there is such an abundance of economic statistics that when you consider how they can be manipulated,
inclusive of historical trend analysis and the combination of data which have no causative relationships, it becomes impossible to discern what is
really going on.
I believe what we have happening is a divorcing of the market from the reality of the economy. Another way to put it is a greater divide between
Wall and Main Street. There was a time when synthetic financial instruments were not used by a vast majority of the Street. In such a situation,
folks could review their pension/401k holdings and see true stocks and bonds. Things they could understand. The elite on both sides of the isle
for different reasons liberalized the use of synthetics and created a situation where folks had no idea what they held in their portfolios. Hell,
even the CEOs of some of these investment banks did not know what was on their balance sheets. I know because I used to work for one.
What that creates is a stock market has no relationship with what is happening on the ground due to the increase in the percentage of investments not
being "real" instruments. What exactly is a credit default sway overlayed and hedged with currency derivitives anyway?
This creates a situation where so many statistics are put forth that are conflicting that all of the statistics are meaningless. The fact is simply
that there is no truly predictive value in economic statistics or any projection based on statistics. When the variables are constrained you can get
close, but with the level of variables and the degree of integration between these variables, the forecasts and predictions are meaningless, yet they
are touted as facts.
As it relates to the OPs point. I think its true. Its all down to the methodology in how you calculate the statistics. What is happening now is
that folks are short selling their homes and buying homes at 1/3 the price. The inter-relationship between the short sell and the buy is unknown
unless you understand the methodology. There could be a time lag which artificially elevates "buys" for a short period until the "defaults"
catch up or the defaults could be are categorized as sells since the seller is essentially "selling" the house, albiet at a value far less than the
loan amount. Lay on top of that the banks that are selling hundreds of homes to LLCs with cash and they will be classified as a sell, despite the
fact that they are treating the house essentially as a security.
Bottom-line for me is that you have a massive disconnect between how the folks who have money make money and the folks who have no money. That makes
acquisition of money more opaque to the lower class and will ultimately create a class of permanent serfs. I do believe there are forces in
government who for different reasons have this as a goal. I just am not sure how "master plan" their actions are.
Oh I have no doubt that conversations like "hey, if we legalize all of the Mexicans we'll have another 14m voters". we can also liberalize voter
registration in such a way as to make voter fraud impossible to feret out. Then we can under fund the voting oversight groups to ensure that the
fraud is further enabled. Oh and not forget the census we have in our hip pocket." Remember that just a few months ago Rahm wanted to personally
run the census? I don't think he has a ton of time on his hands and is looking for work to do. Why do you suppose he wanted to do that?
In the earlier part of the last century, Joseph Stalin had a method he used to take control over the rural population of Russia. He would look at a
small village of say, 200 people. He had sociologists calculate for him the number of folks in that village (based on that village's actual
demographics) who, if killed would cause the rest of the folks to comply with the government. Then he'd send a few thugs in and immediately kill
that number of people, like 16. No more, no less. Job done. The 186 would do what ever they were told to do.
If folks don't think that the left has similar statistics regarding the number of impoverished, dependant on government people we need in this
society to ensure the complete take-over of the government and welfare state, I think you're being naive - thats what they've been working towards,
under the blanket of compassion for 6 decades.
Again, I agree with you, I just think it is a loose ideological deal rather than a small cabal driving it