This topic is in the Military & Government Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


NORAD and Chemtrails




Topic started on 27-5-2004 @ 03:03 PM by Jaypeth


I have heard rumors/explinations about chemtrails being a part of a radar system. The logic being that the tiny metalic particles they spray in the air help carry radar signals. I know that the spraying in Canada and the US is at a constant, Since Canada is part of NORAD. Is it posible that NORAD is responcible for spraying the north american continent in atempt to create a real time radar?, for the purpous of detecting any objects entering or leaving the atmosphere over North America. If anyone has a link or has heard of similar rumors please let me know



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-5-2004 @ 03:11 PM by titian


Jaypeth, that is an interesting viewpoint but how would you explain the reports of chemtrails over the midwest? In order to enter the atmosphere a certain angle is required. Too steep and the craft burns up and too shallow and the craft skips off the atmosphere. Given that, an effort to reenter the atmosphere over NA would likely result in detection from anything along the physical borders. I wouldn't see the need for such a radar in the middle of the country.

Secondly, how would you control the orientation of the metallic particles such that they direct the radar reflections back to a monitoring station on and not into each other?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-5-2004 @ 03:18 PM by Jaypeth


In the same fasion as a radio signal travels farther when it is overcast useing the moisture in the air. Real time radar is like a magnetic barrier, In theory most similar to a force field, with the purpous of detecting any interfearance occuring from objects passing through. UFOs dont necicarily need a entry angle. just a thought but i suspect NORAD to be mainly concerned with detection UFO entrys



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 11:04 AM by elmariachi


There are no such thing as chemtrails, they are all contrails. Unless you have substantial evidence convincing otherwise I suggest you stop this silly debate.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 11:11 AM by Enki



Originally posted by elmariachi
There are no such thing as chemtrails, they are all contrails. Unless you have substantial evidence convincing otherwise I suggest you stop this silly debate.


You're not going to get anyone to stop talking (or believing for that matter) about chemtrails just because you say so. You might have better luck if you link to any of the numerous chemtrail threads where the existance/non-existance of chemtrails has already been debated.

Anyways, surely someone could draw a conclusion between metallic particles being sprayed in the atmosphere and scalar weapons?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-5-2004 @ 11:25 AM by Bangin



Originally posted by titian
Secondly, how would you control the orientation of the metallic particles such that they direct the radar reflections back to a monitoring station on and not into each other?


See chaff:

4: material (as strips of foil or clusters of fine wires) ejected into the air for reflecting radar waves (as for confusing an enemy's radar detection or for tracking a descending spacecraft)

www.m-w.com...

www.reviewjournal.com...


RENO -- Some Nevada officials criticized a federal report on military chaff and said the document raised more questions than it answered about whether the radar-evasion material was harming people or the environment.

The military has insisted the material is not harmful, but the report by the General Accounting Office concluded that its health effects were unknown and that more studies were needed.

....

Chaff, made of tiny fibers of aluminum-covered fiberglass, is dropped by military aircraft to confuse enemy radar systems. Tons of the stuff have been dropped over Nevada, mostly by jets from the Fallon Naval Air Station.

Once it reaches the ground, chaff breaks down into particles small enough to inhale. Rural Nevadans complain it is frequently dropped over their homes, but they have no idea if it is safe.





[Edited on 5/28/2004 by Bangin]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-5-2004 @ 11:22 AM by Strider


I think it is important to distinguish between the day-in-day-out spraying, at relatively low altitudes (approx. 10,000 ft.) and the occassional test involving powders, aluminum, and what not. I feel that the "tests" are part of the exit strategy. A casual mention that tests are concluded would dismiss the whole issue in everyone's mind. No one would wonder why entire populations have been sprayed for 5-6 years with chemicals whose only value is to produce lung damage and reduce everyone's immune system.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 0.096 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread