It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This book stands on its own, making the case for global warming about as clear as is possible, relying on peer-reviewed science at every stage, from the most alarming reports to reassurances that we can actually do something about it.
Originally posted by Essan
Maybe they should have spent 5 minutes reading Arhennius first?
Originally posted by metamagic
This is entertaining!
Uh oh.. are you fiddling with sources here? I'm not melatonin.
Originally posted by Deny Arrogance
Here is a juicy bit of hypocrisy from non-peer reviewed Arthur P. Smith on his Amazon review of An Inconvenient Truth:
This book stands on its own, making the case for global warming about as clear as is possible, relying on peer-reviewed science at every stage, from the most alarming reports to reassurances that we can actually do something about it.
Originally posted by Deny Arrogance
Claiming peer-reviewed science makes Gore's work infallible
but not having his own paper, that you and the OP's article cited, validated by peer review.
That hypocrisy.
Originally posted by Deny Arrogance
reply to post by metamagic
Claiming peer-reviewed science makes Gore's work infallible but not having his own paper, that you and the OP's article cited, validated by peer review.
That hypocrisy.
This book stands on its own, making the case for global warming about as clear as is possible, relying on peer-reviewed science at every stage, from the most alarming reports to reassurances that we can actually do something about it.
Originally posted by Ionut
you got that right.. once I warmed up a mansion with 14 rooms by use of a single light-bulb
Originally posted by ventian
No one seems to have the ba**s to say it so I will. Those two guys may be just a handful of scientists we have left.
Originally posted by FortAnthem
Of course Gerlich and Tscheuschner have been blacklisted by the climate-change community and have had labels such as "Stupidity," "crackpot," "dross," and "bunkum" applied to their work.
Seems like the truth has no place within scientific circles anymore.
Originally posted by TarzanBeta
I believe that people either really like their "science" jobs, really like a random cause, are really gullible, or feel guilty for littering so much. There might even be other reasons I am not calculating.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Originally posted by FortAnthem
Of course Gerlich and Tscheuschner have been blacklisted by the climate-change community and have had labels such as "Stupidity," "crackpot," "dross," and "bunkum" applied to their work.
Seems like the truth has no place within scientific circles anymore.
Follow the money. No money means no research. No research means no paychecks for otherwise unneeded professions. The money comes from Politicians with agenda's. Cap and Trade means billions and eventually trillions in peoples pockets. They don't say what the Politicians want them to say they get no funding. I think it is that simple. Science has been usurped by Politics and fabulous wealth for a select few. One very powerful person with the initials A.G. comes to mind.
The University of Alabama in Huntsville Climate Model Evaluation Project - $1.8 Million
This project will directly address the cost of energy for manufacturing, industrial, and residential electricity. This research will show how effective potential policies will be in impacting the climate and how confident one can be in their achieving the intended outcome. The University of Alabama in Huntsville will examine and evaluate climate model simulations to determine the level of performance these models achieve so that policymakers may develop a better understanding of the reliability of these forecasts.
“Given the tremendous burden that any climate change legislation would place on the U.S. economy, it is imperative that any steps are taken only after achieving reasonable certainty that they will produce the benefits necessary to justify the associated costs,” said Shelby. “Information gained from the Climate Model Evaluation Project will be of great benefit to policymakers, ensuring that they are better informed as climate legislation is debated.”
Originally posted by FortAnthem
A couple of German physicists have looked at the case for manmade global warming and have come to the conclusion that the concept would violate the laws of physics. I never bought into this garbage to begin with and it’s nice to see some real scientists with the backbone to stand up to the “consensus”.
Originally posted by FortAnthem
Of course Gerlich and Tscheuschner have been blacklisted by the climate-change community and have had labels such as "Stupidity," "crackpot," "dross," and "bunkum" applied to their work.
Seems like the truth has no place within scientific circles anymore.
Originally posted by malcr
Guess what I'm not going to. I'll just sit here and see how dumb the skeptics really are.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
this is insane...these people are crackpots...listen to them if you want, they also just said a standard greenhouse that gardeners use...and a tarp you toss over a plant during a chill is physically impossible.
guess you can get any degree over the internet these days.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Earth is not a closed system...the warming is coming from the sun...it is trapping rays based on the density of greenhouse gases...
the falty logic here is that they are saying earth is closed...and yes, if we didnt recieve rays from the sun, we could release all the carbon we want without it warming up.
also, if you keep a actual greenhouse without sun, it wont warm up either...
this is insane...these people are crackpots...listen to them if you want, they also just said a standard greenhouse that gardeners use...and a tarp you toss over a plant during a chill is physically impossible.
guess you can get any degree over the internet these days.