It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Indian head of the UN climate change panel defended his position today even as further errors were identified in the panel's assessment of Himalayan glaciers.
Dr Rajendra Pachauri dismissed calls for him to resign over the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change’s retraction of a prediction that Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035.
But he admitted that there may have been other errors in the same section of the report, and said that he was considering whether to take action against those responsible.
Originally posted by December_Rain
out of 4000 pages of report, one finds a single page of error and grips it and repeats it day and night.
Originally posted by December_Rain
It's a comical situation out of 4000 pages of report, one finds a single page of error and grips it and repeats it day and night. What about the rest of 3,999 pages? Nevemind, I know the answer, humans are healing the environment and everything is nice and dandy.
Successful indoor growers implement methods to increase CO2 concentrations in their enclosure. The typical outdoor air we breathe contains 0.03 - 0.045% (300 - 450 ppm) CO2. Research demonstrates that optimum growth and production for most plants occur between 1200 - 1500 ppm CO2. These optimum CO2 levels can boost plant metabolism, growth and yield by 25 - 60%.
Obviously they saw they could make money, and get more power over this and thought they could keep quiet the decent scientists who would decide not to jump in on the AGW scam...
For what other reason is there for this scam to have lived for so long, with the blessings from some like Pachauri?...
OK, here's a couple of issues for the ATS research forum:
How much money was given to support the false 'Himalayan Glacier' premise and conclusions?
How much money was diverted to the 'Himalayan Glacier disaster' due to this report or to "avert" the 2035 "disaster?"
How much has been sought to avert the 2035 Himalayan Glacier disaster?