It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Commerce Clause gives no authority for Congress to transform a citizen's individual choice to be inactivein the marketplace into a compulsion to purchase apparently unwanted insurance or be penalized.
Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
The Commerce Clause gives no authority for Congress to transform a citizen's individual choice to be inactivein the marketplace into a compulsion to purchase apparently unwanted insurance or be penalized. Never has a citizen been under threat of government fines or taxes, to purchase an unwanted product or service simply as a constitution of existing in the country.
I will sue the U.S Goverment if the health care bill passes in it's current form.
Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
Do I need to post every thread you have created using full length material stolen sir?
... I gathered some info to make my point on health care being illegal. So if you want to flame my threads I would appreciate it if you would at least leave half of a decent comment, rather than acting like a forum ratt, who loves to argue rather than make a point.
Mr_skepticc
Never has a citizen been under threat of government fines or taxes, to purchase an unwanted product or service simply as a constitution of existing in the country. I will sue the U.S Goverment if the health care bill passes in it's current form.
Originally posted by kettlebellysmith
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Sir, the reason you are required to purchase insurance for your authomobile is that being allowed to operate a motor vehicle in most states is considered a privelige, not a right. And this is a states rights issue, not a federal issue.
Health care is not a right. It is a privilege. You have the right to find a job(which you did) You have the right to purchase health care insurance, if you choose. And you have the right to refuse the rfid chip. Which I will do. And I think most Americans will. We are not all sheep.
Originally posted by HappilyEverAfter
I'd still like to know who is going to enforce this? How is this going to actually be implemented and enforced. It's going to rely on basically each and every one of us, turning eachother in, citizen against citizen.
Is my doctor going to turn me in? , not if he wants patients. The police coming to my home and checking? Federal agents, insurance sweeper teams? Or will they ATTACH it to something, some process, like possibly as mentioned earlier for reference, a drivers license, or taxes. It's all so logistically insane. Even with a disaster the chaos that would happen when this was forced would be pretty crazy. You'd be hard pressed to ever find normal on the streets, anywhere. I just dont get it!
Quote from : Wikipedia : Real ID Act
Demonic Creator of the REAL ID ACT Defends His Creation
The REAL ID Act of 2005 (Rearing and Empowering America for Longevity against acts of International Destruction) is a U.S. federal law that imposes certain security, authentication, and issuance procedures standards for the state driver's licenses and state ID cards, for them to be accepted by the federal government for "official purposes", as defined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
The Secretary of Homeland Security has defined "official purposes" as presenting state driver's licenses and identification cards for boarding commercially operated airline flights and entering federal buildings and nuclear power plants.
The Act is a rider, formally Division B of H.R. 1268, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005.
The REAL ID Act implements the following:
Changing visa limits for temporary workers, nurses, and Australian citizens.
Establishing new national standards for state-issued driver licenses and non-driver identification cards.
Funding some reports and pilot projects related to border security.
Introducing rules covering "delivery bonds" (rather like bail bonds but for aliens who have been released pending hearings).
Updating and tightening the laws on application for asylum and deportation of aliens for terrorist activity.
Waiving laws that interfere with construction of physical barriers at the borders.
As of April 2, 2008, all 50 states have either applied for extensions of the original May 11, 2008 compliance deadline or received unsolicited extensions.
As of October 2009, 25 states have approved either resolutions or binding legislation not to participate in the program, and with President Obama's selection of Janet Napolitano (a prominent critic of the program) to head the Department of Homeland Security, the future of the law remains uncertain and bills have been introduced into Congress to amend or repeal it.
The most recent of these, dubbed PASS ID, would eliminate many of the more burdensome technological requirements but still require states to meet federal standards in order to have their ID cards accepted by federal agencies.
Originally posted by links234
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
You're drawing connections between things that aren't there.
Mandatory health insurance doesn't mean mandatory doctor visits. No RFID chip, unless you want one.
What is REAL ID to you? An alteration to your state issued ID so that it has some semblence of standards with other states ID's? When the DMV and the doctor's office merge, maybe I'll see the connection. They haven't, I don't.
Just like the big, scary swine flu three months ago I feel that your worries are for naught.
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
It does however mean mandatory paycheck deductions, something I will never condone.
And the R.F.I.D. is not mandatory, now, but it starts with out as a non-mandatory thing.
And works into mandatory.
...
The simple answer is by the time it is full swing people will be begging for it.
Because it will be linked to medical records and electronic money, through credit cards.
Originally posted by links234
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
It does however mean mandatory paycheck deductions, something I will never condone.
So you're against state and federal taxes and social security deductions and whatever else they take out of your paycheck? Meh...fair enough.
Originally posted by links234
And the R.F.I.D. is not mandatory, now, but it starts with out as a non-mandatory thing.
And works into mandatory.
...
The simple answer is by the time it is full swing people will be begging for it.
Because it will be linked to medical records and electronic money, through credit cards.
As the saying goes, "I for one, welcome our alien overlords!"
In all honesty, being the tech geek that I am, I would be more than happy to have a microchip implanted into the palm of my hand for financial and identification purposes. Bring on the cyborgs!
Originally posted by links234
Back on topic, you can't tell a LAWMAKER something is illegal, because they can simply MAKE A LAW to make it legal. So either get with it or come up with something that will fix the problem in a better fashion.
Originally posted by links234
There are problems that I, and millions of others, recognize as problems in this country and no amount of Jefferson quotes will sway my belief that something needs to be done to address those problems.
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
Well, good for you, wear your slave collar proudly.
I will not wear one.
Never.
Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidasIf you're not with America you are against America and if you support the laws passed without our consent because politician's are listening to lobbyist groups, special interest groups, and or "big business", whether it is Wal-Mart or the now largely touted "Healthcare Industry", you are against America.
[edit on 23-1-2010 by SpartanKingLeonidas]