Originally posted by Skyfloating
If its based on reason and benevolence I dont mind the Government managing some of the big stuff.
Well that is necessary for the time being, however, in an ideal world the government does not control or oppress us, no? And I'm not speaking of some
lofty unachievable utopia, we can absolutely (and must) achieve environmental sustainability and a reduction in oppression/suffering of human
beings.
Only an adolescent mind is scared of polices and bosses. Adults dont see them as superior but as equals.
I'm not afraid of polices/bosses, I'm saying they're fundamentally UNEQUAL to the rest of us, thus their lord-like power over us. And to counter
your notion, I see it as adolescent and pathetic to acquisce to authority figures without question or resistance when appropriate. There are models of
society and business in effect right now around the world where true democracy/freedom reigns, things like cooperatives and community justice where
every person has an equal share of the pie and the decision-making. Nobody is above or below another. This has actually proven to be more efficient
and more fulfilling to workers/people than top-down structures.
You are 100% responsible for your life. You seem to believe Wall-Street and Banks are, but Banks are nothing other than a service offered to
you - its your responsibility to accept or refuse that service.
You're putting words in my mouth. I never said Wall-Street/Banks are responsible for my life, what I'm saying is that they've gained quite a lot of
power/leverage over economies, consumers, debtors, and the populace. You'd be an absolute fool to deny that they have real powers that actually
affect real people beyond that person's control. This is wrong when such powerful/rich entities end up screwing large portions of the populace over,
and it happens all the time. You seem to have this very childish/simplistic view of the marketplace and products/services. It's absolutely not
anywhere near as simple as that. There are serious problems in our system, unacceptable ones, and it's not simply a matter of voting with your
dollar, that is NOT Democracy.
You are saying this goes beyond socialism and communism, but it being bottom-up and classless/non-hierarchal its just yet another variation of
Communism.
No... being bottom-up, classless and non-hierarchal is not just "another variation of Communism". You can't simply lump all non-hierarchal
societies as a form of some commie conspiracy. If you actually analyze the tenets/writings of the original thinkers behind communism/capitalism, they
essentially wanted the same thing- the common man/populace controls markets/governments without a top-down tyranny of the wealthy/powerful over the
rest of us. Well... the problem is that in theory capitalism/communism sound fine and dandy, but in practice they have lead to tyranny, oppression,
theft, and environmental destruction. This is in part because they're adapted within our hierarchal civilization, part because they expect PERFECTION
out of imperfect people, and in part because they allow for a tyrannous middle-man to transition. Something like Parecon can cut out the middle-man
and go straight from grassroots to an alternative to oppressive hierarchies.
"Every one of your systems is a utopian system. Democracy would be heaven-- if people would just be better than people have ever been. Of
course, Soviet communism was supposed to have been heaven too ... Your justice system would work perfectly if people would just be better than people
have ever been. And of course your schools would work perfectly under the same conditions." - Daniel Quinn, My Ishmael