posted on Jan, 10 2010 @ 11:31 PM
After spending several hours, i mean like 5 straight hours lastt night till early morning looking through every page on there im not even done yet i
think i went through about 60 pages so far that was just pentagon photos. in the beginning i was like you all and thinking this guy is crazy thats
just different angles and the guardrail and sidewalk are obscured by the one in the foreground. but that aside i was looking at his pictures for other
discrepancies and red flags. the firetruck and the burning cars are real important even though it looks like a crazy guy mistaking different angles.
in the first shot where the car is starting to burn it looks like a 350z and not a 300zx. look at the distance between the front wheel and the front
bumper on a not burning 350z and 300zx you will see that theres no way the car thats burning at first (white car) is the same as the one thats burned
at the end (300zx). then theres the way the background is manipulated, one second the burnt jeep is sitting in the parking lot next to he building,
then its under rubble, then its under more rubble and moved further right. then it moves some more, then its got a girder throgh the windshield and
over what used to be the roof, then in another shot its at a totally different angle and draped over the hood of the car. lots of discrepancies and
differences in the scene from picture to picture. then theres the first shot when the fire trucks first arrived which i witnessed live on tv along
with a reporter saying "it doesnt look like a plane crashed anywhere near here" theres no debris on the lawn and theres no dead bodies, or people
running for their lives or anything. just a small fire and firetrucks putting it out. and i saw that they put it all out on tv. then later on theres
more fire and the walls collapsed and theres wreckage everywhere and people carrying things covered in blue tarps. if you go through each page and
scrutinize the pictures yourself in your own opinion and keep his in mind too you will see that the things that he says wash with your own thoughts on
the fakery of the 9/11 event. im gonna go back and finish reading through all the pages, hopefully it doesnt take me another 6 hours, but if it does
i dont care. this is the type of evidence ive been looking for even though ive found a lot and no one seems to care if the'yve already decided to
believe the official story. but people who are suspicious should be pointed to this site theres just too much photoshopping going on for the official
story to be true.
my favorite pictures of the series are the propaganda ones. with the washington monument in the background of the pentagon, then they replace the
washington monument with capital hill. then capital hill again but this time larger, then a larger wash monument. people will say its because of the
angle of the shots, but if you look at the aerial pics showing the scale of the washington monument and capitol hill in the background of the pentagon
theres no way they could look that large as if they are DIRECTLY behind the pentagon unless you photoshop. just the fact that they are photoshopping
subliminal patriotic elemtns into the pics is enough to raise all eyebrows. the absolute fave for me though is the firemen putting out the fire in
the hole that this 747 went into without hitting the cars parked right next to the hole with the planes wings or leaving debris near the hole. in this
shot theres firement like 3 or 4 putting out fire with hoses and theres AN AMERICAN FLAG RIGHT WHERE THEY ARE. i mean really? there was an american
flag on a pole right where the plane went in? did the firemen bring the flag with them? or was the flag photoshopped into the picture. and why? for
patriotic effect obviously.
im not saying you should just take it all at face value, in fact i though it was a disinfo campaign at first, but if you get past the first 10-20
pages you will see the rabbit hole getting deeper. you owe it to yourself to look through.