It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by davesidious
reply to post by Xenus
All the actual evidence points to it being a failed Russian missile. All the circumstantial evidence and ass-delving points to it being whatever the fevered imagination of the person in question wanting it to be.
Russia admitted it launched a missile. What we saw was perfectly congruent with a failed missile test, from the exhaust plumes, to the spinning, to the illumination from the sun, to the exhaust plume reaching back down over the horizon.
I've read all of your 'evidence' and not found it to contain ANY actual evidence to the contrary, just people who clearly don't understand what EISCAT is trying to do, mixing that with a healthy dose of paranoia and absurd distrust of every rocket scientist and meteorologist ever interviewed about this phenomenon, a complete lack of knowledge of basic physics, and coming up with "ZOMG! EISCAT SUPER MEGA PLASMA WEAPON ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE!!!1111eleventy". So, to recap, come up with actual evidence, and we'll talk. Until then, the obvious and untouched explanation of a failed Russian missile stands. ICBM launch was warned. ICBM went up, ICBM failed (again), ICBM created spiral, ICBM fell to Earth. Case closed.
Originally posted by ProRipp
reply to post by davesidious
I know full well how icbm's work mate and if you think this thing originated from the white sea theres only one thing flawed round here ! Can you guess ?
PS. please post your thesis and convince me it was a failed missile ?
[edit on 023131p://12America/Chicago28 by ProRipp]