Nasa proposes robotic rocket-plane to explore Mars, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 26-11-2009 @ 05:44 PM by mars1
reply to post by dashen



I agree in part that NASA just wastes money like that stupid space station and this thing is only a drone and it will only stay in the are for a couple of hours at the most.
I think they should get man back on the moon that is a lot closer and there is so much we do not know about it that makes it worthwhile.

THANKYOU



reply posted on 27-11-2009 @ 12:23 AM by Phage
reply to post by mars1



The airplane has a 6.25 m wingspan with a total wet mass of 185 kg and has to ability to fly over 600 km through the atmosphere of Mars with 45 kg of MMH / MON3 propellant.

ntrs.nasa.gov...

In five years, the two Mars Exploration Rovers have covered a combined distance of about 21 km.

It sounds pretty cool but I doubt it will be selected.




[edit on 11/27/2009 by Phage]


reply posted on 27-11-2009 @ 03:16 PM by mars1
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



You make a good point there it really puts it in prospective i think they should put at least two mapping satellite's up there with a high quality camera on board Mars needs to be mapped in more high quality could solve some mysteries too the drone is not a good idea because it will not cover a lot of ground.

THANKYOU



reply posted on 27-11-2009 @ 04:01 PM by Phage
reply to post by mars1


Right now there are two very good satellites in orbit around Mars; Mars Express and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

ARES would be able to perform tasks that neither an orbital or surface platform can.


reply posted on 27-11-2009 @ 04:19 PM by mars1
reply to post by Phage



Are you on about this phage.


CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - -- In the wake of criticism that NASA's next-generation Constellation Program rockets are behind schedule and over budget, agency engineers are hastily reviewing alternative designs for a new heavy-lift rocket capable of exploring the solar system affordably and relatively quickly.
Among the options they are looking at: a rocket made of the space shuttle's external fuel tank, engines and solid-rocket boosters that has been championed by freelance engineers and hobbyists, and a successor to the Saturn V that once carried astronauts to the moon.

LINK www.chicagotribune.com...
If so looks like it's not in there plans if it's not this you are talking about is there another ARES program sorry for sounding a little uneducated on the subject you have a lot of knowledge on this sort of thing thanks.

THANKYOU


reply posted on 27-11-2009 @ 08:26 PM by toreishi
NASA is currently developing ARES rockets as part of its CONSTELLATION program.

ARES I

ARES IV

ARES V



then there's the ARES Mars scout proposal

Aerial
Regional-scale
Environmental
Survey of Mars

ARES Scout Proposal



is it just a case of NASA running out of acronyms? or could they have another totally different but much more sinister ARES program hiding in plain sight?

"yea, we need to spend this much for the ARES program. what do you mean which one? i mean the "ARES" program!"

right.

[edit on 11.27.09 by toreishi]


reply posted on 27-11-2009 @ 09:20 PM by Phage
reply to post by mars1



No.
I'm talking about your OP.
Aerial Regional-scale Environmental Surveyor


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 03:55 AM by mars1
reply to post by Phage



Thank you Phage but the problem with it is it will not stay up for long so it's not going to cover much ground but the ground it covers there would be some good image's.
But NASA are at a point where they do not know what to do at the moment.

THANKYOU


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 04:29 AM by mars1
reply to post by toreishi



Thank you for the video's after watching them all i got to say is this is absolutely ridiculous its like a toy plane it would probably fail.
Im glad im not putting money into this if they go with this i think it will fail.

THANKYOU


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 04:52 AM by toreishi


this one looks a lot worse than the ARES scout



it looked ridiculous and it flew and i guess it failed those people who were hoping that mankind wouldn't be able to fly. luckily, most people don't think like the poster above me does, or do they?

[edit on 11.28.09 by toreishi]


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 05:17 AM by mars1
reply to post by toreishi



Now now it's nice to see you have a sense of humour what i was trying to say is to me it seems a step backwards that's all.
Like i said above somewhere if it works it will get some good image's and data but it will not cover a lot of ground so please do not say it like i have a closed mind i am no expert in the subject i am here to learn like most and i have my own opinions just like you.

THANKYOU
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 5 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags