It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You can also call the above "rationing", exactly what will happen if the government runs health care for all of us.
Originally posted by ANNED
I started as a priority 8 low income veteran because i was broke and between jobs.
One of the first things i did was to apply for service connection for my hearing loss and tinnitus from working in engine rooms on ships when i was in the navy.
When i got service connected for tinnitus (10%) my status changed to priority 3 when my hearing gets bad enough for hearing aids i will go to 20%.
And if congress ever allows blue water agent orange claims for the agent orange that our ships evaporators picked up and we drank i could go as high as 50 to 60% for my diabetes. They call sailors who's ship operated off the coast but never set foot on shore of Vietnam blue water vets, but the ship i was on we worked so close to shore the water was always brown from shore runoff. This would put me into the priority 1 or 2 level.
I worked as a EMT in Calif and Nevada and seen the ERs of many hospitals.
I will have to say that that the VA has always been the best. with the lest waiting times for treatment i have ever seen. (no illegals helps)
I know that the one i go to is good at heart attack and bypass surgery because i gone went through that. have not had any problems since.
Originally posted by RoofMonkey
reply to post by lucentenigma
Probably not a whole lot.
Where the points of contention come in are where the Military claims there was no hazard but there was a hazard. The specifics of the activity that caused the exposure would not necessarily be part of the treatment issue. Even it it is, that's one of the side benifits for having military doctors... much easier to get them cleared.
Originally posted by lucentenigma
Have you ever read about the military employees at Area 51 (burning toxic chemicals in open pits) that sued the government for health issues and were denied because it is a state secret?
Originally posted by RoofMonkey
Originally posted by lucentenigma
Have you ever read about the military employees at Area 51 (burning toxic chemicals in open pits) that sued the government for health issues and were denied because it is a state secret?
Yes I have... and I also have a good friend who was never in Laos working at the other end of the runway from Air America while not attached to USAID. And while he was not there he was also not on active duty in the USAF.
[edit on 11-11-2009 by RoofMonkey]
Originally posted by lucentenigma
Sorry about your friend who was never in Laos...
Originally posted by RoofMonkey
reply to post by lucentenigma
Probably not a whole lot.
Where the points of contention come in are where the Military claims there was no hazard but there was a hazard. The specifics of the activity that caused the exposure would not necessarily be part of the treatment issue. Even it it is, that's one of the side benifits for having military doctors... much easier to get them cleared.