It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On being asked about US position on the Dalai Lama's visit to Arunachal Pradesh, which is claimed by China as a disputed territory and contested by New Delhi as an integral part of India, Kelly said, "We just don't see it in any other way than that. We don't think we have a position, necessarily, on his decision to travel to this area."
Human rights campaigners have criticized Obama for declining to meet with the Dalai Lama when the Tibetan spiritual leader was in Washington in October to receive a congressional human rights award. White House adviser Valerie Jarrett in September said Obama would meet with the Dalai Lama after the president’s trip this month to Asia, a commitment Bader reiterated.
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by Davidius
More likely IV? Or perhaps V? One might think that the war is currently being waged in biochemical level. But who knows. I hope that India and China are reasonable enough not to start spewing missiles upon each other just because of some irrelevant monk.
-v
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The tension goes far beyond just the Dali lama(and to call him irrelevant is naive-he is a symbol for millions of people, just not for you).
Border disputes have been going on over there for a while, and there have been troop buildups going on for months.
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The tension goes far beyond just the Dali lama(and to call him irrelevant is naive-he is a symbol for millions of people, just not for you).
Border disputes have been going on over there for a while, and there have been troop buildups going on for months.
Have you looked for Dalai Lama's opinion of what he thinks about himself? For example, have you read a single book of his? I have and based on those, I am quite certain he regards himself quite irrelevant, regardless of what everyone else think. But you are free to call my opinions naive, for it means absolutely nothing.
Yes I know the "conflict" is due the situation of Tibet and goes beyond the character of Dalai Lama. The reason why India is on it's toes with China is because in their perspective Dalai Lama and his followers are representatives of modern buddhism that India recognizes; yet China is a communist state, hence atheist. Furthermore, China is invading Tibet without any justification.
Respectfully,
-v
[edit on 10-11-2009 by v01i0]
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I don't think nothing. I do not know nothing. But it doesn't stop me being ignorant, but encourages it.
Please, keep your knowledge to yourself. It is very irrelevant to me if people choose to regard some body as their spiritual leader, like Popes or Lamas. That is a stupid thing to do.
-v
Originally posted by v01i0
reply to post by captaintyinknots
You're right absolutely right of course. And I am merely happy that your agenda is gaining visibility by staying on top due this little and irrelevant exchange of words. But yeah, call me narcistic and naive, it doesn't make any difference - the focus here is beyond you and me my friend.
Anyway, regardless of my words, the impacts of HH to his followers are far beyond my opinions, no matter what I say. I am unsure why I posted on this thread on first place - maybe I was just being lunatic, as usual
Or maybe I like being called with names, who knows.
-v
Originally posted by CuteAngel
reply to post by CuteAngel
Obama May Raise Tibet, Rights Issues Directly With Hu (Update1)
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
I have no agenda, and I called you no names. I pointed out facts.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
You really ought to research india-china-pakistan tension, if you think this is only about Tibet and the Dali.