I was wrong, if this is right. apollo did land on the moon., page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 10:40 PM by PsykoOps
Originally posted by jra
Speaking of Apollo and satellite images. A new image of Apollo 17 has just been released. It's at 53cm/pixel (the previous one was at 1.4m/pixel). Here's a
link that shows some images from it. There's also link at the bottom of the page for the full image.


Thank you for this. Cant wait for the hoaxers thoughts on this. Of course it's photoshopped or maybe they went all out and took satellite images in a studio!


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 05:28 PM by DaMod
I would like to add something. Read the whole thing, it is relevant to this thread.

Some of you really need to know how a reflector telescope works..

Yes the Hubble has some great magnification abilities (digital for deep space and pure focal length for solar system) which makes it nice for taking pretty pictures of planets which is all fine and good, but what you guys don't seem to know is when it comes to space magnification means jack squat.

It's all about aperture! Aperture is the diameter of the scope. The bigger the diameter, the more light you can gather. The Hubble can gather TONS of light. That's how we get all those really neat pictures of distant objects.

To make this example, here is M42 (or the Orion Nebula) from the Hubble.



Here is M42 from an earth bound Dobsonian telescope (the Hubble is actually a massive Dobsonian telescope)



This is actually crappy and my Dobs looks better so a better example would be from an Observatory here on earth.



Make sure to compare.

The reason the Hubble image looks so much clearer is because the Hubble gathers so much light (and is not inside the atmosphere), they can actually magnify a small deep space image (not physical but digital magnification from outside computers) because of how much light the Hubble can absorb.

How is this relevant to this thread?

Well if you where to point the Hubble at the moon it's focal length would zoom you in heavily, but that's not the problem. The Hubble can catch so much light that the surface of the moon wouldn't even look like a blob, it would look like a pure white image.

[edit on 2-11-2009 by DaMod]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 5 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags