Originally posted by chiron613
Well, to be fair to this guy, his previous video (or tape, or whatever) did say "October". He was pretty clear that God told him "October", not
the 13th specifically. He did add that part, theorizing that for whatever reason it wouldn't happen during the Feast of Tabernacles, which ended
Saturday. So he figured that the following day would be a good day to nuke Washington.
I'm wondering, though, whether he's assuming that the "heart of the nation" is Washington, D.C. He's switched between naming the city, and
calling it the "heart of the nation". I don't know what he thinks God told him, but it leaves him a very slight "out". If Washington doesn't
get nuked, but some other place in the US does, he might get away with claiming, "Oh, *that* was the heart of the nation. Oops. My bad."
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that there won't be a nuclear attack anywhere in the US, during the month of October, 2009.
On his last(?) radio show he said someone told him Washington, D.C. wasn't the heart of the nation, and he responded that may be what is commonly
thought, but God says it is the heart for his own reasons. (I'm paraphrasing.)
But I know what you mean about being fair to this guy. Weeks before his 11th prediction I knew he said God told him October, Washington D.C. between
9:00am-9:00pm and that the 10th-11th or any other date setting was only his own speculation. Anyone who spent a few minutes of time to do a little
Googling could have come to the same conclusions. The videos and the threads that were saying Washington D.C. was going to be nuked on the 11th
didn't do any research at all and were misleading.
In any event, I did post on a previous thread here at ATS an article he wrote of predictions for 2008 that looked like a pretty obvious fail to me but
I left it open for people to draw their own conclusions.