It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Oh right. You speak of the devil. I understand.
Go ahead and research to "attack" me . I'll try my best to limit the jabs. Personal request here, though. If you do use one of those "Humongous list of verses showing what is bad in religion", please make sure to check it up in the textual context in any one of the major translations. I find that Islam Awakened is a good resource, if a little cumbersome to read.
As for why I think god is a personal God:
Well..there is the personal reasoning: I have "experienced" god, felt god, been comforted, given strength, tetc.
Then there is the abstract reasoning: If you have a omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient god, it is obvious that such an entity would be fully capable of having a "personal relationship" to each and every thing in the universe.
God is god to all humanity, not just muslims. I'm very sure that Hindus, Christians, Jews, whoever can, and have experienced God in some form. A name is just a name, a string of sounds we associate to an object. We might use them to make identification easier, but God is not limited to names.
As to your final statement, as I said, some of the properties of God are omnipotence, omnipresence, omniscience, etc. So unlike humans, God does not get tired, god does not get bored, god does not have to leave off one aspect of creation because another may be deemed "more important" by some. God is concerned with all things, at all times, in all places
As I said, colouring the idea of God with our own perceptions wouldn't work. God is fully capable of handling all things with perfect precision. There is not the idea that "this is less important" "this is unimportant" "this is important".
And yes, as I mentioned earlier, I believe the Quran to be truth..
The punishment lies with God.
There are some who claim that the punishment for apostasy is death, and use certain hadith to back their theory. I think this is not correct, because there are many hadith where the Prophet didn't have the apostate killed or anything.
The punishment of death came because of treason during a battle, not because of apostasy.
Now I'll be the first to admit, there IS the concept of capital punishment in Islam, but it isn't for some minor personal thing like apostasy. It is for stuff like murder, or treason, etc.
Another point I'd like to make. I find the modern concept of "shariah" to be a farce (note the emphasis on modern). Each person you ask, each country you check that claims to follow Islamic laws, they've introduced their own perversions, ideas and traditions.
Last point, following the previous one, there are many states in the world today that claim to be "islamic", when they're just nonsense. I speak only for myself, as a muslim, and while these countries may be doing lots of horrible things, unless they are clearly based off Islam (in the sense that "The Quran says , and these people are doing it!" and not in the sense of " is a bad thing, and I see lots of muslims doing it, thus Islam is evil!"), I'd think that'd be outside the bounds of this discussion. Thanks!
I never said Allah didn't create man through evolution. I don't think Allah said it either. It is certainly possible that Allah created man through evolution.
In a personal aside:
I've mentioned this whenever some "science vs religion" or "creationist vs evolution topic" comes up, but I'll reiterate here. It really annoys me how two sides (theists and atheists) have picked up alternating ends of a completely unrelated field (science) to hold up as their flag. It ends up with reasoning like:
"I disagree with evolution because I believe in God"
or
"I don't believe in God because of the existence of evolution"
Which I'm sure you'll agree are both very illogical and backwards approaches to take, and can hinder the pursuit of knowledge by inserting politics into it.
As to your second question, I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Mecca has certain history. According to Islam, it is the place Muhammad was bor;. It is the city of the Ka'aba (which has much history of its own); it is the place that Hagar and Ishmael settled; it is the place muslims go to perform pilgrimage every year.
If you mean the purpose of the pilgrimage, those are numerous too. The most obvious would be instilling a sense of brotherhood (all those people together with a common purpose), giving a sense of "religious achievement", and setting aside a part of your life specifically for religious pursuits, etc.
Creation of Adam & Eve While Islam recognizes the general idea of the development of life in stages, over a period of time, human beings are considered as a special act of creation. Islam teaches that human beings are a unique life form that was created by Allah in a special way, with unique gifts and abilities unlike any other: a soul and conscience, knowledge, and free will. In short, Muslims do not believe that human beings randomly evolved from apes. The life of human beings began with the creation of two people, a male and a female named Adam and Hawwa (Eve). The Qur'an describes how Allah created Adam: "We created man from sounding clay, from mud moulded into shape..." (15:26). And, "He began the creation of man from clay, and made his progeny from a quintessence of fluid" (32:7-8). Thus, human beings have a fundamental attachment to the earth.
Having a soul, or special place on earth doesn't negate the idea of evolution for me.
By "illogical", I didn't mean that the actual viewpoints may be illogical (ie. pro-evolution, anti-evolution), I meant statements like (what I quoted before):
"I disagree with evolution because I believe in God"
or
"I don't believe in God because of the existence of evolution".
The one thing (belief in God) has absolutely no logical connection with the other (the idea of evolution). It would be like saying "I think beef tastes bad because apples are yellow".
Because of a certain amount of obstinacy, if we ever get new information (such as evidence negating/updating evolution, or evidence unequivocally confirming it), we'll have one side rejecting it solely because they feel the need to defend themselves against the other side. And that isn't the spirit of scientific discovery.
Originally posted by slymattb
Weather you want to believe it or not people can experience God. There is a life after death.
Originally posted by Myrtales Instinct
I'm not quite sure if you are just wanting to debate for/But if you would like to have, what all of us people of faith have - a personal relationship, I would suggest your questions be more oriented
Originally posted by slymattb
I deleted the u2u I swear I thought it was you, but could be wrong.