AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


Who mentioned a Global Hawk Hitting the Pentagon?




Topic started on 4-10-2009 @ 11:39 PM by Seventh


In case none of you are reading Weedy`s flights thread atm you will have missed this juicy titbit, what the hell is going on here?.......




And a link to the source ......

whatsallthisthen.wordpress.com...



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more 9/11 Conspiracies topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 11:58 PM by OmegaPoint


The painjob is faked in that photo I'm certain of it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 12:05 AM by Traffic


Theres not even any shadows and the American is clearly a gradient effect in photoshop, I could do better!

I'm not saying that something fishy isn't up with the original story, but this is bogus.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 12:06 AM by LwSiX


Amateur hour + adobe photoshop = ^^ that picture.

Its definitely a fake.



[edit on 5-10-2009 by LwSiX]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 12:07 AM by Deaf Alien


Yes. That's a fake.

Look at that man's face (on the left). It's blurred due to lousy photoshop job.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 12:12 AM by dainoyfb


Also here:
AA GH



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 12:31 AM by turbofan


Fake, or not (I believe it's fake) that image paints a very clear picture
of what a military super-power could potentially do with an alternative
aircraft (whether it be a 757, or a GH).

It's not tough when you have trillions at your hand...most of which can
be lost without paper trail...just sayin'



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 02:23 AM by OmegaPoint


The profile from the only 5 frame video released, shows an A3 Sky Warrior type profile, and mostly certainly NOT that of a Boeing.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 02:57 AM by Rewey


For the love of God... PLEASE tell me you're presenting that photo as indicative of what COULD happen, as what it MIGHT look like, and not presenting it as actual evidence of what is intended to be a legitimate GH painted like a Boeing???

I can accept dodgy photoshop when people are trying to demonstrate something, but not THAT dodgy when it comes to pretending to be actual evidence...

Rewey



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 06:29 AM by Mark_Amy


Seventh, I always read your posts with interest and I really admire the time you put into your research and the thought you put into your posts, but this one is a bit of a disappointment. The debunkers are going to eat you alive with this one and it will be difficult for them to take you seriously in the future.

If it is just supposed to be a representation of what could have happened then where do you draw the line? You could post photoshopped pics of anything concerning 9/11, but it's not going to help the cause.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 06:31 AM by Mark_Amy


Originally posted by Deaf Alien
Yes. That's a fake.

Look at that man's face (on the left). It's blurred due to lousy photoshop job.


It's blurred to protect his identity, as are the other faces.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 06:55 AM by TrickoftheShade


If the world's media gets a hold of this the whole damn 9/11 conspiracy will be blown apart once and for all.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 07:31 AM by Seventh


Where in this thread did I state `Finally, proof of an inside job?`, come on I think everyone knows me better, if this was the real deal it would have been all around the world by now, hell it was released in July, all this was intended for was an eye opener, and how easy it is to project an image to fool people.

Now if people thought they saw a 757 and saw this picture it may just hit home to the memory source in the brain and make it stutter.... `Hold on a second!!!`.

Catch my drift?, like I say, if this was the real deal I would have made a huge thread, not just a couple of lines, kinda disappointed in some of you to think otherwise .



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 07:53 AM by trebor451


Originally posted by Seventh
In case none of you are reading Weedy`s flights thread atm you will have missed this juicy titbit, what the hell is going on here?.......




And a link to the source ......

whatsallthisthen.wordpress.com...


That is hilarious....plus, when the author of that blog article says:

I am a strong supporter of the work that Craig Ranke and his Citizen Investigation Team (CIT) have done regarding events at the Pentagon.


coupled with that EXCLUSIVE image of an American Airlines Global Hawk, just another example where we should just throw in the towel and start practicing our frog walks...*sob*

Great picture, btw....my dog could have done a better photoshop, though, and he's dead.

I guess the *real* amazin' thing is that there are Troothers who actually believe that is a real photo. Snort.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 08:29 AM by Seventh


Originally posted by trebor451




And a link to the source ......

whatsallthisthen.wordpress.com...


That is hilarious....plus, when the author of that blog article says:



I guess the *real* amazin' thing is that there are Troothers who actually believe that is a real photo. Snort.


On the contrary I think events like these are good, it shows one aspect of all this that helps 100%, and that is creating illusions to feed the cause, and agree on that guys blog he has some great content but puts it across completely wrong, the FOIA part relating to the flights was an interesting read, gonna look at that later.

The false Sheen and Obama interview, not really sure if that helped the cause or not, but - no publicity is bad publicity.

/cheers.


   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 11:28 AM by GoodOlDave


Originally posted by Seventh

The false Sheen and Obama interview, not really sure if that helped the cause or not, but - no publicity is bad publicity.

/cheers.



I absolutely agree. The more these damned fool 9/11 conspiracy web sites are caught red handed pulling outright chicanery like this, the more material it gives me to show how they're nothing but a bunch of snake oil peddlers deliberately trying to get people paranoid in order to sell them useless junk. True, no publicity is bad publicity, but it's also true that no credibility is bad credibility.

Thank you for proving me right, from the bottom of my heart.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 02:22 AM by ipsedixit


Could this be why that lady in Brooklyn shouted "That was not an American Airline! That was not an American airline!" (Madly flipping through her "Janes: All the World's Aircraft".)

Thanks OP. I'm beginning to think that 9/11 was an inside job. lol.

[edit on 6-10-2009 by ipsedixit]



   copyright & usage 

























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.082 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.