Originally posted by gYvMessanger
I wish he had though that would have been an awesome youtube vid.
There was a great one like that of a guy who wanted to make sure his data wasn't recoverable from his old hard-drives so he took all 12 of them and
stacked them together horizontally and shot them repeatedly with a 50BMG Rifle. It was a beautiful thing to watch.
Every once in a while you'll see YouTube videos of people popping a few rounds at their failing technological devices in frustration and anger. Our
parents used old bottles and cans. We now use old computers and iPods for target practice.
The thing that got me most about this news article, despite it actually being comical, was that he never drew his weapon. He never made a threat to
the store employee.
He made a joking threat to an inanimate object!!!
Think about how many times each of us have made a joking threat to an inanimate object?
So what if the employee didn't take it as a joke, and got scared? Sounds like the Apple Store employee needs to try Decaf. So what if he threatened
an inanimate object? He didn't draw his gun and he didn't act upon his threat. It would be one thing if he had threatened a person, but should
inanimate objects get that same legal protection against threat of injury or harm? (Well, they do when it is someone else's inanimate objects/legal
property.)
I'm hoping the DA tosses this one out. The guy wasn't the wisest bloke in the world, but in his stupid anger he didn't do anything criminal.