It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So Neanderthals, were a different species ? or were they also "put here in current form" How about the other 4 or 5 branches of Homo erectus where they also "put here" ?
Originally posted by sisgood
I posted a few days ago requesting proof that the bones all came from the same creature.
I haven't had any response yet... strange.
Hundred-thousand-year-old samples of DNA have been recovered from fossilized bone, but contamination with modern DNA is rampant in many ancient DNA studies and previous claims of DNA that was millions of years old could not be reproduced.
Originally posted by sisgood
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I know my thoughts don't mean much to you, but I am a little amused that they are too old for genetic tests. I'm sure that in a couple of weeks or days this new "missing link" will be debunked.
Originally posted by TheAmazingK
I just finished reading the small article CNN has on their website. Very interesting! It's crazy to see how long our evolution has taken. That skeleton is a million years older then our previous oldest skeleton. Which wasd 3.2 million, I think.
It's hella lucky she got trapped in volcanic rock. Otherwise there's no way this skeleton would still exist. Great also to see that the scientists who thought we evolved straight from chimp some new food for thought. Both our species evolved from a common ancestor?
Makes alot more sense.
It also raises a few questions in my head about how self aware chimps might be, by this point in their evolution. But that's just me.
Originally posted by Mr.Hyde
On an interesting side note:
Cheetahs have the genetics of both the dog and cat family and due to interbreeding each Cheetah is 99% identical. Google Cheetah genetic diversity. Why has this species not advanced? Its movement through the ages allowed them to stay essentially the same skeletal make up, same dietary habits. How is it that only Humans evolved to benefit from intellectual growth .. this is to say that only our species was subject to evolutionary improvements as per the argument of the survival of the most fit shows that other animals on this planet are essentially, as they have always been according to fossil record, at their evolutionary peak.
Originally posted by Frontkjemper
However, as others have already posted, how do we know that the males learned to walk upright because the females wanted food for lovin? It certainly sounds plausible, but to be honest, it sounds like people are grasping at straws here, I don't see how they deducted the reasoning behind their theory.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Great posts there Lurch, enjoyed reading that.
So Neanderthals, were a different species ? or were they also "put here in current form" How about the other 4 or 5 branches of Homo erectus where they also "put here" ?
Neanderthals are a different species (although there is some debate over that). A difference in cranial capacity of 200cc or more is the convention for naming a new species. Both Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon had larger cranial capacities than modern humans (about 1600cc to our 1200cc for adult males).
Originally posted by sisgood
I posted a few days ago requesting proof that the bones all came from the same creature.
I haven't had any response yet... strange.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Yes of course there was the pigs tooth, incorrectly assembled fossils, etc. And I agree a lot is not intentional but it can be really hard to piece together old bones when you aren't sure what you've got.
Nebraska Man is an example of science working well. An intriguing discovery was made that could have important implications. The discoverer announced the discovery and sent casts of it to several other experts. Scientists were initially skeptical. More evidence was gathered, ultimately showing that the initial interpretation was wrong. Finally, a retraction was prominently published.
Originally posted by helen670
The Bible Scriptures teach that it is the Word of God, why should man change Gods Word to fit in with Modern ideas?
At least the Bible has been consistent with what it teaches and doesn't change it's mind every few years or so!
Originally posted by helen670
reply to post by Lurch
Hi Lurch/
The Bible Scriptures teach that it is the Word of God, why should man change Gods Word to fit in with Modern ideas?
At least the Bible has been consistent with what it teaches and doesn't change it's mind every few years or so!
EDIT...spelling..
ICXC NIKA
helen
[edit on 10/3/2009 by helen670]
Originally posted by newworld
something seems off. How come this thread has not been hijacked by those who claim evolution is pure lies and sensationalist nonsense and that there does not exist one shred of evidence for it?
By now this would have turned into an evolution versus creationist debate, did they leave ATS
Originally posted by rocknroll
What if this news is just a "spin" thrown into the media? Maybe the TPTB want people to think, "There was no Adam and Eve, we all came from apes, so stop believing in a higher power." Maybe this is an attempt to turn people away from religion.