It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dna42
There is no such thing as telepathy, telekinesis or anything bypassing the laws of nature. Entertaining: arguably so. True: Not in the slightest.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by dna42
There is no such thing as telepathy, telekinesis or anything bypassing the laws of nature. Entertaining: arguably so. True: Not in the slightest.
You, sir (or madam) are exactly, 100% correct. There is nothing that humans are currently capable of that bypasses the laws of nature.
But, what if i told you that you have 14 (or 17), not 5 senses? What if you considered the purpose of the VNO (and its unknown uses), or the fact that you have small organs in the palms of your hands and soles of your feet that detect magnet changes (and now you know how divining works, right?).
100% within the rules of nature. If you really want to blow your mind, consider where your mind actually is. It isn't in your brain, and there is ample evidence of this (such as hemispherectomy survivors that graduate college). If we can come to terms with where our mind is, we can come to terms with variations on experience that are opened up by such knowledge.
Don't be too quick to fall for the age old arrogance of man, who perpetually thinks that he, at that particular moment, represents the pinnacle of what mankind could become. Once you get past such illusions, you soon realize that you (like all men) are ignorant fools grasping blindly in the darkness of the unknown.
Good luck and try to enjoy the fruits of your research anyway
There is no such thing as telepathy, telekinesis or anything bypassing the laws of nature. Entertaining: arguably so. True: Not in the slightest.
also, the 65% thing . . . i don't see the relevance of that figure.
I call bull#. I am open to any scientific research, which there has been on this matter, quite a lot actually. No proof that such thing exists.
Originally posted by dna42
I am not arrogant just because I accept the way reality is as we know it is. By science. Science is not arrogant, nor close-minded. I am not talking about my personal view nor do you have to convince me. You'd have to convince the lab. Show me just ONE proof that survives any double-tests in the lab according telepathy or the likes and I will shut my mouth forever.
There HAS been evidence via the lab tests performed by Puthoff. You can be led to water, but you must decide to drink it yourself.
I am not saying that these things are impossible, just that there is no proof whatsoever and gladly there is not the slightest hint that such thing exists, I wouldn't want other people to jump around in my thoughts
Why do you think that the research has been stifled? People, on the whole, don't want to find this type of capability. Perhaps the above, bolded statement represents why you dismiss Ingo without looking into his evidence.
I call bull#. I am open to any scientific research, which there has been on this matter, quite a lot actually. No proof that such thing exists.
I know we don't know everything and I am and stay humble about it. We don't yet know what dark matter or energy is. But I do not claim telepathy, gods, angels or any other supernatural BULL# without providing the proof.
I only read stories, some good, most bad. Stories don't mean anything but entertainment.
Like i said, there are a couple of thousand pages at his website. Go and find the water there to quench your thirst. But please stop pretending that the research hasn't been done, and that it isn't available.
Originally posted by Spirit Warrior 11:11
reply to post by dna42
Sorry, but that statement is pure ignorance. You have obviously not done any research. Especially since you THINK you know what the laws of nature are. People like you used to kill other people for saying that the Earth moved around a central sun....which is AGAINST the laws of nature!!! Ha.
Have fun watching MTVs Real World instead of reading about something REAL.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Like i said, there are a couple of thousand pages at his website. Go and find the water there to quench your thirst. But please stop pretending that the research hasn't been done, and that it isn't available.
Remote viewing, like other forms of extra-sensory perception, is generally considered as pseudoscience [8] due to the lack of replicable results, and of a positive theory that explains the outcomes of experiments
Pseudoscience is a methodology, belief, or practice that is claimed to be scientific, or that is made to appear to be scientific, but which does not adhere to an appropriate scientific methodology,[1][2][3][4] lacks supporting evidence or plausibility,[5] or otherwise lacks scientific status.
Originally posted by SecretGoldfish
reply to post by Spirit Warrior 11:11
oh yeah, i see clinically why 65% might be a target to train towards and would carry some relevance . . . i just don't see why that would have been important to axelrod at that point