Nibiru Flyby Scenarios, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 26-9-2009 @ 11:08 PM by star in a jar
2012 is by far the most likely date for this happening, I don't know how people came to believe it would come before 2012...

2000? 2003, 2005... 2000 was supposed to be the time when computers reset themselves because of a programming glitch, cue the crashing planes and bank accounts... 2003? 2005? wasn't that the times when we would start to see signs of it coming... IE: warming of the solar system, not only on Earth but on Mars (Cue the carbon tax scam).

How was Nibiru (Doesn't 'Nibiru' refer to the planet that orbits the Brown Dwarf (Planet X) anyway?) supposed to come before 2012 or 2018? Wasn't it originally said that Nibiru would come AFTER 2012 by a couple of decades anyway?

Maybe saying Nibiru would peak its destruction before 2012 was a misinformation campaign to shame people into believing that we didn't live in a binary star system, when it was really supposed to come around or make its effects known in 2012, the most popular date for the 'end of the world as we know it'

I don't believe it will 100% waste our planet; it would just make life horrible or impossible for the unprepared and the dependent, even the environmentally exposed (sea level flooding)

I've come to realize that we might not be able to see it at all, since it is a brown dwarf companion to our sun that only emanates heat, and little light.

At its closest to Earth it might appear just as a star or a haze of light, not as a burning sun the size of the moon, or something so obvious.

Why else would:

Governments all over the world build deep underground bunkers and seed vaults; and obfuscate information about a possible Planet X, and how even after tens or hundreds of thousands of years of Homo Sapien on this planet, our recorded civilization is only 'recent'?




[edit on 26-9-2009 by star in a jar]


reply posted on 27-9-2009 @ 12:17 AM by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by star in a jar
How was Nibiru (Doesn't 'Nibiru' refer to the planet that orbits the Brown Dwarf (Planet X) anyway?) supposed to come before 2012 or 2018? Wasn't it originally said that Nibiru would come AFTER 2012 by a couple of decades anyway?


Actually Sitchin himself believes it will come around 2032...probably long after he dies.


Maybe saying Nibiru would peak its destruction before 2012 was a misinformation campaign to shame people into believing that we didn't live in a binary star system, when it was really supposed to come around or make its effects known in 2012, the most popular date for the 'end of the world as we know it'


Actually its the same doomsayers, they just changed the date when it didnt appear the first few times.


I've come to realize that we might not be able to see it at all, since it is a brown dwarf companion to our sun that only emanates heat, and little light.


Well thats where the Nibiru'ers contradict themselves. They say its a brwon dwarf and will be visible in the sky soon? The only way to identify brown dwarfs is by infrared, measuring their radiation output


Governments all over the world build deep underground bunkers and seed vaults; and obfuscate information about a possible Planet X, and how even after tens or hundreds of thousands of years of Homo Sapien on this planet, our recorded civilization is only 'recent'?


Well their could be hundreds of reasons. To assume the only reason for this is due to the imminent arrival of a planet, which only reference text was translated by an economist (rather than a real ancient texts scholar) is not very plausible.

If it arrives in 2012 I will humbly accept I was wrong....if it doesnt arrive, what date will the Nibiru'ers come up with next? Because we know they wont admit it doesnt exist


reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 02:27 AM by antithesis.
I have a hard time believing in the Nibiru stuff. It seems to me that Zecharia Sitchin is the main guy behind this idea, but when you read through the site www.sitchiniswrong.com... you realize that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Aside from the 3600 year elliptical orbit.

Of course I can't claim to know that it is absolutely not true it just doesn't seem like something that would exist in our solar system to me.

The main cylinder seal that Sitchin bases his theory off is has been proven logically to be other than what he says it is:

www.sitchiniswrong.com...


reply posted on 20-10-2009 @ 11:57 AM by fallenearth

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russians know, We assume, NASA is silent ...
  Posted 10 days ago with 35 member flags
Are we paying attention enough? Strange Sounds in the sky
  Posted 17 days ago with 33 member flags
Sun flares affect our pineal gland, causing mass awakening?
  Posted 2 days ago with 33 member flags
Bring Your Toothbrush? A Journey To The Stars...
  Posted 8 days ago with 23 member flags
2012 Believers are the Definition of Sheeple
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
Tell me to stop
  Posted 7 days ago with 11 member flags
The Chevy Silverado 2012 Mayan Apocalpse Commercial
  Posted 7 days ago with 10 member flags