It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DYING cancer patients could be weaned off taxpayer-funded drugs as the Federal Government is confronted with spiralling health costs. Health Minister Nicola Roxon wants debate about the moral challenge as the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee plans trials to determine when costly drugs become ineffective and should no longer be dispensed.
But apart from cancer drugs - which can cost taxpayers up to $50,000 a patient - Ms Roxon is asking why doctors dispense expensive, subsidised drugs to patients when cheaper generics are prescribed.
Originally posted by Kaytagg
There's a good plant you can grow which treats cancer.
Costs about $30 in fertilizer, and 6 months of grow time.
....
Not sure why the government has it banned, while expensive pharmaceutical with dangerous side effects are being paid for with our tax dollar.
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
i know a few people dying of cancer, unfortunately the treatment is worse than the affliction one guy is terminal and they keep giving him all these hardcore painkillers that make him so sick he cant get out of bed where as i suggested a herbal alternative that numbed the pain stopped his nausea and helped him regain his appetite right at this moment he is in Bathurst at the races running his business on his prescribed meds from the doctor he would be laid up in bed.
so which is the better method and which provides the greater quality of life?
as i said earlier its all about control ...
the Hippocratic oath is dead and $$$ is the new doctors oath
[edit on 8-10-2009 by Demandred]
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
he stopped taking his meds himself they had him on morphine and a few other different ones but as i stated they made him violently ill, i just suggested an alternative snake oil to the poison the doctors were dishing out AFTER he stopped, he couldn't eat he couldn't sleep he was in sever pain and was always feeling nauseous
so you tell me should i have kept my mouth shut ?
he sleeps well now, eats well now the pain is manageable but never completely gone he has his quality of life is good.
he is terminal no chance of getting better the cancer has spread too far for that.
and the last time they tried chemo he nearly died
death is inevitable but now he lives his life instead of laying in bed ...
[edit on 9-10-2009 by Demandred]
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
i think were on the same wave length
how ever ATS terms and conditions restrict any clarification which should be confirmation enough for the nature of the treatment.
all i know is it helps him and i would never recommend anyone stop taking prescribed medications from a qualified doctor as probably like you i feel for the most part they dont work, they may or may not complement a treatment but that is a discussion for another day.
peace
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to post by VneZonyDostupa
if he wasnt terminal and stopped his treatment i woulda kicked his a$$
its a very sad situation i think he still hopes that a miracle cure will arrive in time and make him well again but hes tried i think just about everything even imported trial medications over from the US that were said to had success in reducing the size of the tumors all to no effect.