The Link
Franken, who opened by acknowledging that unlike most of his colleagues in the Senate, he’s not a lawyer, but according to his research “most
Americans aren’t lawyers” either, said he’d also done research on the Patriot Act and in particular, the “roving wiretap” provision that
allows the FBI to get a warrant to wiretap a an unnamed target and his or her various and changing cell phones, computers and other communication
devices.
Noting that he received a copy of the Constitution when he was sworn in as a senator, he proceeded to read it to Kris, emphasizing this part:
“no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized.”
“That’s pretty explicit language,” noted Franken, asking Kris how the “roving wiretap” provision of the Patriot Act can meet that
requirement if it doesn’t require the government to name its target.
Kris looked flustered and mumbled that “this is surreal,” apparently referring to having to respond to Franken’s question. “I would defer to
the other branch of government,” he said, referring to the courts, prompting Franken to interject: “I know what that is.”
Excellent.
I am happy to see Franken standing up for our constitutional rights while others sit idly by or actively participate in the destruction of 'we the
peoples' rights.
While you may not like Franken, or the Democratic party as a whole, you have to admit THIS is at least one action that is in-line with our rights and
demonstrates what acting on behalf of the people and not the establishment looks like.
Two thumbs up for Al.
Enjoy.
