reply to post by kinda kurious
That's the same judge that dismissed the Major Cook case after his orders were rescinded.
Judge Land's Ruling was a bit disturbing
in that we have a judge using the IMAGE of a "birth certificate" posted at FactCheck.org as evidence -- he references it at least twice in his
decision -- but refused to even look at any other "evidence."
It puzzles me how this judge can point to an electronic image posted on an Internet website to support his decision, and, at the same time refuse to
even consider what appears to be a genuine, hard-copy, government-issued birth certificate.
The judge found, "...mere allegations of a constitutional violation unsupported by a reasonable factual foundation are insufficient to warrant
judicial review."
How does he know Orly's case was "unsupported by a reasonable factual foundation?" He never looked at a single piece of evidence.

