A question about the use of the word socialist.

Originally posted by badgerprints

Originally posted by Annee

Probably any form of government would work in its purist form.

The problem with ALL of them is corruption & abuse - from both sides (leaders & citzens)

I agree with that,but the depth of conflict with capitalism versus socialism doesn't seem to be the threat of corruption and abuse, both have it, but the ideal of independent achievement versus collectivism.

Even with that basic difference notwithstanding. Why would one side declare it proudly and the other deny what they are?

[edit on 033131p://f40Saturday by badgerprints]

I'm almost leaning towards advocating a Constitutional "Council of Guardians" like Iran has. That body screens political candidates for ideological conformance.

Since Govt-Run Schools have failed to pass onto the newer generations what American Liberty is all about, we need to a defensive layer to weed out the brainwashed collectivists.

But I realize such a thing would be against our principles too.