posted on Aug, 14 2009 @ 08:06 PM
reply to post by TheMythLives
I didn't really form an opinion about his demise, or lack thereof.
But consider this: I'm walking home to change clothes for dinner. I just happen to be passing the home of my ex-wife and children. Think I will go
peer into the BASEMENT WINDOW. (For one.) A little strange? Particularly since the first time ever, someone happens to be being murdered at that
particular moment in time. A little too coincidental for my liking.
And apparently he did talk with several people following the murder, and basically said the same thing, however, that only shows he had the presence
of mind to maintain consistency in his deception.
Now, the bloody footprint in the garden did have me going for a minute, but although they never identified the footprint, there is nothing to suggest
they ruled out our dear Lord either. Plus, when you are innocent you don't just run away. You stand up on your hind legs like a man and fight for
your name/honor/innocence. You don't just turn tail and run. This was a father.....he chose to leave his children with this legacy?
Also, it was alluded to the lack of his blood or hair, etc. at the scene, but at the same time, we have no evidence which suggests he was injured in
anyway, or that there was reason to believe his blood should have been at the scene. Or did I miss that?
Now sing along with me:
HAPPY BIRTHDAY DEAR THEMYTHLIVES
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU
YOU ARE ADORABLE