It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter sends back pictures of Apollo sites

page: 1
9

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 19 2009 @ 11:07 PM
link   
I find this very interesting. NASA finally released pictures containing parts that we have left behind on the moon. I found the pictures here. Now, what I find MOST interesting is this picture.

They claim that that line is the footprints left behind. If they can claim that barely noticeable mark as "footprints", what about the other, more clear anomalies that we at ATS have found? Some of the things we have found are 10x clearer and more definable. Most people would claim that the "footprint" trail left behind as a "photo error" when in reality it isn't. Makes you wonder about some of the pictures you have seen of the moon, doesn't it?


Anyways, I may be just rambling on about nothing but I find this to be extremely interesting and almost as proof to some of the other anomalies we have found written off as something else...



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 06:50 AM
link   
You mean the CELEBRATION DRAWINGS of the apollo landing sites...



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 06:59 AM
link   
reply to post by xBRINGxONx2012x
 


I thought the exact same thing. If a picture this quality would be used to show anomalies on the moon many people would call that pareidolia.
edit to ad:
But I do believe that your country went to the moon and that these photos indeed shows what NASA claims.

[edit on 20-7-2009 by derpif]



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 07:44 AM
link   
Has anybody cross-checked these images with known landmarkers or references of the close up apollo shots?



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 08:25 AM
link   
Millions and millions of dollars for these...??????????????

li ne 2



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 08:30 AM
link   
if you want evidence of parts we left behind on the moon, there really is no disputing this:



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 09:05 AM
link   
Where are the buggies? I wanna see buggies and buggy tracks



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 10:34 AM
link   
reply to post by thewaynester
 


Yes, by all means, show me some pictures of the lunar rovers and the tracks that they made. The LRO's high res camera should be alble to pick these up fairly easily. I was also hoping for higher resolution photographs as well. I did not want something that could be "the lower end of the LEM's" Now we are supposed to believe the tricks of lights and shadows.



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 10:41 AM
link   
lol.

as technology improves and resolutions get higher and higher, we will eventually, and thankfully see the moon hoax crowd pack up their trailer and move back into the church parking lot they came from. You know, the one that has jesus cradling baby dinosaurs painted in a mural.



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 11:13 AM
link   
reply to post by djusdjus
 


Are you serious? You don't think we have high res images of the moon already?

They are just not released to the public...thats all.

Ask your self...why not?

Why do "they" keep throwing us low res questionable as to what things are images?????

Millions upon Millions upon Millions.....FOR THIS?????



Look how pixelated this crap is....

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/81200003f374.jpg[/atsimg]

Yet....


I can get this on google's house...Patio furniture.....chairs...ect....
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b839aca75cee.jpg[/atsimg]

If you guys think we are getting the best possible image.....



Don't you think NASA would give us something truly irrefutable..if it really was...irrefutable

Yet they give us low res...copy of a copy images to hide the truth.

Come on people.....open your eyes



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 11:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Overload
 


Do you happen to have a clue about the differences between airplanes and satellites ?

Sheesh....this will never end.....



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 11:30 AM
link   
reply to post by Phil J. Fry
 


[sigh]...


DUH.......

However....the camera technology is the same...if not better on a satellite DUH

Not to mention there is NO atmosphere to look through DUH



posted on Jul, 20 2009 @ 11:34 AM
link   
Existing thread here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Please add further comments to the ongoing discussion.
Thank you







-thread closed-



for future reference:
Search ATS




top topics



 
9

log in

join