David Wilcock claims he is a reincarnation of the late Edgar Cayce, correct? WRONG. The man is a scam artist.

Edgar Cayce on his next incarnation:


“I had been born again in 2100 A.D. in Nebraska. The sea apparently covered all of the western part of the country, as the city where I lived was on the coast. The family name was a strange one. At an early age as a child I declared myself to be Edgar Cayce who had lived 200 years before. Scientists, men with long beads, little hair, and thick glasses, were called in to observe me. They decided to visit the places where I said I had been born, lived, and worked in Kentucky, Alabama, New York, Michigan, and Virginia.

"Taking me with them the group of scientists visited these places in a long, cigar-shaped metal flying ship which moved at a high speed.

"Water covered part of Alabama. Norfolk, Virginia, had become an immense seaport. New York had been destroyed either by war or an immense earthquake and was being rebuilt. Industries were scattered over the countryside. Most of the houses were built of glass. Many records of my work as Edgar Cayce were discovered and collected.

"The group returned to Nebraska, taking the records with them to study... These changes in the Earth will come to pass, for the time and times and half times are at an end, and there begins those periods for the readjustments...”


So there you have it.... David Wilcock is a fraud.

indeed, and a terrible....Oh Gawd, a terrible singer to boot. I was subjected to one of the videos from his "landmark" album recently. The Horror! The Horror!

For what it's worth, I think he believes what he spews out. I don't consider him a psycho, just a schizo who needs help, and shouldn't be making any claims. Many people freak when they hear these kinds of bizarre claims. It's not cool at all to be flipping people out. Especially when times are already tough.

The guy needs professional therapy. Preferably, an orthomolecular therapist who can provide the necessary nutrients his individual biochemical makeup requires for healthy functionality.

[edit on 16-7-2009 by unityemissions]

could you please direct me to a page where these excerpts came from? I would love to read them.

ty

Wilcock has more intellect in his right pinky nail than you do.

Are his reincarnation claims a bit off the wall? Yes, but his work and research are unmatched by many.

Sorry his words and ideas went over your head.

[edit on 16-7-2009 by Nassim Haramein]

I'll admit that I like a lot of what David Wilcock is saying, but I always cringed at the Edgar Cayce part. (And his singing)

He is one of the few people out there who actually has a positive message and who isn't regurgitating the same NWO/FEMA Camps/WWIII/RFID Chip fearmongering crap ad nauseum.

But as with everyone else in the "fringe" area he is only human & some of his ideas are better & more plausible than others.

I think it's important not to disregard the entire work of a given researcher on the basis of one or two questionable ideas.

I like how the OP claims that little quote by Cayce is proof that David is a fraud. How ignorant. First you're assuming that Cayce himself wasn't a fraud and that the future he speaks of is set in stone. I think we can all agree that the future is always subject to change. As far as Cayce being a fraud or not, I'm somewhat on the fence about it. Sure he made some remarkable predictions that in my opinion do prove he had some ability that most people do not. However, there are also many other predictions that were false. What about those? Why can't this one be one of them? Before you label me as an advocate for either side let me say that I'm not saying David is or isn't Mr. Cayce reincarnated. All I'm saying is, your so called proof is not proof of anything in regards to your debate. You stated nothing but an opinion, which you are entitled to

Well your evidence is a bit off....but david wilcock is just an out and out scam artist,trying to rake in some bucks before 2012 and he is shown to be nothing but a circus act for gullible viewers.

Originally posted by Solomons
Well your evidence is a bit off....but david wilcock is just an out and out scam artist,trying to rake in some bucks before 2012 and he is shown to be nothing but a circus act for gullible viewers.

Care to elaborate?

Originally posted by Nassim Haramein


Wilcock has more intellect in his right pinky nail than you do.

Are his reincarnation claims a bit off the wall? Yes, but his work and research are unmatched by many.

Sorry his words and ideas went over your head.

[edit on 16-7-2009 by Nassim Haramein]

His ideas aren't even his ideas, he's basically ripped off of cayce's ideas, and put his own twists in them (that probably have come from message boards such as this one). Sorry you're gullible.

Originally posted by Solomons
Well your evidence is a bit off....but david wilcock is just an out and out scam artist,trying to rake in some bucks before 2012 and he is shown to be nothing but a circus act for gullible viewers.

How is it off? If one were to believe that Cayce was accurate in most of his predictions/ future insight. And if that same man were to say his next incarnation was to be in 2100 A.D. Then I'd have no reason not to believe him.

Cayce or Wilcock? I think I'll go with Cayce.


Wilcock is nothing but a convincing scam artist.

Originally posted by Solomons
Well your evidence is a bit off....but david wilcock is just an out and out scam artist,trying to rake in some bucks before 2012 and he is shown to be nothing but a circus act for gullible viewers.

Oh you mean the countless free stuff (DVDs, books, etc...) he gives away on his site.

Dick Cheney is a scam artist........perhaps you should rechoose your words more wisely.