I don't think so. Why would the alleged perpetraters of the 911 incident not use a tried and proven method of demolition, i.e., explosives? Too many
things can go wrong with the jumbo jet plan of demolition, and they got it right on the 1st try, again, I have my doubts for this reason alone.
If you mean, "of course the towers were brought down with explosives (or something of that nature)", then I think you are absolutely right.
That is one of the tip offs to an inside job. The buildings were designed to take the impacts of the aircraft and the fuel fires weren't hot enough
and didn't burn long enough to do the damage ascribed to them.
The planes were part of the scenario because that is a scenario that Americans would easily accept as part of a "terrorist" plot. A building
demolition requires insider access.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.