I'm surprised to say that I found myself reading anything from the New York Times written by a Frenchman but it is well written none the less...
Sometimes I find myself missing the cold war. The well drawn lines of "us" and "them" made it clear who was responsible. The simplicity was comforting
even when facing utter destruction from the other side. But, today is today as we look to our leaders to figure out how to keep rogue nations from
uncorking the "genie in the bottle" that is nuclear weaponry.
The current policy of unrestricted and non-responsive action towards these countries is naive as expressed by Obama, “if countries like Iran are
willing to unclench their fist, they will find an extended hand from us.” Iran's response is typical of what I think he can expect from other
countries like North Korea, "a unified closed fist". Hopefully sooner than later the administration will figure out that the best way to solve these
problems is to use our strength to free the people of these countries from the dictatorships that are oppressed by. Only then will his open dialog
technique really work.
Off Topic: Can anyone writing in the NYT not mention Iraq or George bush in the first two paragraphs of an article. Why don't they print it on a tee
shirt and point it out to everyone they pass by...
www.nytimes.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


