It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr. Toodles
reply to post by Redajin
Alot of people believe in a higher god in simple fear. They fear death. That if there is no higher power and no afterlife, then they will rot and be forgotten for all time. And humans being self conscious about themselves all the time cannot stand that. Generally speaking, humans cannot cope with being on the same level as any other animal on earth. We are all mortal, but hope for something immortal for fear of being forgotten.
Even here I rest in Christ and with Christ; how, then, can I do otherwise than to believe that eternal rest in Him awaits me after death, and after the struggle against earthly enemies? Here without Christ I feel oppressed and in pain; how can I do otherwise than believe that it will be still more grievous to be without Christ there, when He will finally cast me away from before His face? Thus the present state of our souls foreshadows the future. The future will be a continuation of the present inward condition, only in a modified form as to its degree: for the righteous it will be turned into the fullness of eternal glory; for sinners, into the fullness of everlasting torment." St. John of Kronstadt (My Life in Christ, Part 1; Holy Trinity Monastery pg. 51)
~Sayings from ANCIENT CHRISTIANITY~
Originally posted by Bluebelle
The main reason I dont buy into any religions is that there is so many out there. And the main one's have thousands/millions of followers, the majority of whom fully believe and have faith in that they're following the 'true' religion. And its alright having faith and whatnot.. but there's gotta be a hell of alot of people out there that are following a religion that isnt actually real.
Plus theres the whole issue of how people follow their religions. The vast majority of people dont seem to follow their religions word for word. Why not? If thats what you believe in then go for it, follow it... I find it a little odd how people pick and choose which bits of their religions to ignore, and which to go along with.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
Right, well I dont believe in God.. and dont buy into any religions really. But I do think there's something out there that created the universe. Maybe didnt create us, but the universe had to start somewhere right?... Well, actually I suppose it didnt HAVE to start somewhere, but it doesnt make sense to me that things just 'are'. I cant comprehend WHY the universe was created, but still.
The main reason I dont buy into any religions is that there is so many out there. And the main one's have thousands/millions of followers, the majority of whom fully believe and have faith in that they're following the 'true' religion. And its alright having faith and whatnot.. but there's gotta be a hell of alot of people out there that are following a religion that isnt actually real.
Plus theres the whole issue of how people follow their religions. The vast majority of people dont seem to follow their religions word for word. Why not? If thats what you believe in then go for it, follow it... I find it a little odd how people pick and choose which bits of their religions to ignore, and which to go along with.
But yea, I think day to day, I have no need for religion and I get by perfectly fine. If Im having problems or feel down, I watch tv and eat some chocolate and sort things out myself. Ive never felt the need to pray for anyone to help me.
When Im on my death bed I might repent my sins or whatever (just in case ), but until then I have zero need for believing in a particular creator.
Luke 16:31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
reply to post by DaMod
Oh yea, free will to a point I think. Its probably a bit more difficult to have a free choice in what you believe in if say you were brought up in a strict religious enviroment.
I agree that the jist of most religions is just basically try and be a good person. But then there's still all these other guidelines/advice. These are probably the most obvious one's, but a couple of examples..
1. The whole catholic stance on homosexuality. They're against it arent they. Yet very rarely is it now that you see catholic people standing up and saying its wrong and should be illegal etc. You occasionally hear the odd quote from the pope, but thats it. So it seems that being homosexual is now acceptable to most people. What I dont understand about that is why are people changing their views just because society says so? God is supposed to be some amazingly wise, special 'entity', so why go against his teachings?
2. The whole suicide bomber thing. Those guys obviously must be doing what they believe their God wishes them to do, and that they are doing good thing. We shouldnt tell people their wrong for believing in whatever religion, and how much they follow/interpret that religion... so how can people tell those kinds of people that they're wrong?
I think my main issue is that at what point do the guidelines become non-optional? How do you know?
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
I think it has to do with an evolutionary process, where manifestation is tied to proclamation. It has to do with distinctions, and a continual process of differentiation and reintegration, something which can only be delimited via meaning. QM is beginning to grapple with the meaning aspect of creation. Meaning collapses the probability wave into an actuality, and it can also generate a new wave of possibility. This imho, is the Logos, or The Word. It ties into Consciousness and conscious awareness. In the Gospel of John, word made flesh simply denotes God-consciousness in human form, or a sphere within a sphere.
I also think Jesus was or became, through the same process, a walking pineal gland, the gateway, the true vine, etc. the way, the truth and the life, and in his word and world, the way of being that he had achieved was distinct and unique, so he could not help but to differentiate himself from everyone else, with his cross being an attempt to reintegrate with everyone, by taking on all the damage caused by their faulty thinking and separation. A rather ingenious attempt to resolve a fundamental paradox regarding human suffering imo.
By this definition, the Logos is like an arrow of civilized progression, and the Christ, a universal man of such progress embodied, made manifest in the physical universe, here on earth of all places! Yes, that is very solipsistic, but so too are the implications of modern quantum physics.
When looking at Jesus Christ as the Logos, it is also important to consider the mind/body connection and the human mind-universal mind connection.
In this way, a cosmos absolutely filled with life and intelligent civilizations, would do nothing to undermine the Christian faith, maybe only bolster it, revealing that the highest always serves the lowest, where the last shall be first and the first, last. It's an evolutionary proposition of non-locality (you saw it here first), where man, being last, is, at the most fundamental level, no matter how undeveloped from a socio-political-spiritual basis, the most evolved being in the universe, made, by intelligent design, to contain non other than the spirit of the living God, with Christ being the first among many to make manifest or to actualize, the promise made, with integrity.
I know that minds prejudiced with contempt prior to investigation will cry foul, and say that I just posted a bunch of pseudo-science woo woo to support an unfounded Christian faith, and for them, it will not compute. There are many others here reading this, however, who WILL "grok" it most fully, "all those with the ears to hear let them hear."
To better understand the revelation that I'm driving at here, for the Logos, or The Word, look to the Phi Ratio or the Golden Mean, relative to the sacred geometry of the Seed of Life, and then consider man as the most recent, and therefore the very highest expression of the creative principal, in the universe, due to what I call evolutionary non-locality ie: nothing in the universe evolves in isolation, with the whole universe being a non-local, instantaneously interconnected, holographic phenomenon, or in terms of order from chaos, an open system.
This places imo, the whole Biblical framework and human spirituality as an evolutionary phenomenon, in a whole new light (of course you can ignore some of the cultural baggage which got towed along in the process) as well as the political power aspects involved in trying to use "The Word" for the raw temporal power of domination and submission. One has to get around or over their bias against "Churchianity" to see the truth at the very heart of it all.
So you see, in a non-local, holographic universe, local matters, especially here of all places, where the rubber really hits the road in terms of the ongoing struggle in the midst of the paradox of good and evil and of civilized leadership and the neccessity to influence for the greatest possible good of one and all in the house.
And remember too, that the technology of any advanced civilization would be indistinguishable, from magic. Perhaps we live in a universe where there are many players, and unimaginable technologies, the very highest of which is imo, The Word itself, as a type of God-NLP for the creative spiritual evolution of the human being.
"And as my father hath sent me, even so send I you." so there again, it's organic and holographic and progressive, with continuity.
Or, maybe I'm just starting to take in too much '___' from all the meditating I've been doing lately!